soulglory
Actually i am implement a raft in elixir, and i am working on tcp_transport now ,
these are my files
https://github.com/ProgMastermind/elixir_raft/blob/main/lib/elixir_raft/network/tcp_transport.ex
https://github.com/ProgMastermind/elixir_raft/blob/main/test/elixir_raft/network/tcp_transport_test.exs
but i am getting this error when i am running tests
1) test basic TCP transport can connect and send messages bi-directionally (ElixirRaft.Network.TcpTransportTest)
test/elixir_raft/network/tcp_transport_test.exs:51
Assertion failed, no matching message after 2000ms
The following variables were pinned:
node2_id = "node_2_38"
Showing 1 of 1 message in the mailbox
code: assert_receive {:received_t1, ^node2_id, "hello"}
mailbox:
pattern: {:received_t1, ^node2_id, "hello"}
value: {:received_t2, "node_1_38", "world"}
stacktrace:
test/elixir_raft/network/tcp_transport_test.exs:101: (test)
The following output was logged:
20:36:50.514 [info] TCP Transport listening on port 35581
20:36:50.615 [debug] Attempting to connect to node_1_38 at {0, 0, 0, 0}:35581
20:36:50.616 [info] Processing inbound connection from node_2_38
20:36:50.616 [info] Successfully established bi-directional connection to node_1_38
20:36:50.616 [debug] Connection status - T1->T2: connected, T2->T1: connected
20:36:50.717 [debug] Sending message from T2 to T1
20:36:50.717 [debug] Successfully sent message to node_1_38
20:36:50.768 [debug] Sending message from T1 to T2
20:36:50.768 [debug] Successfully sent message to node_2_38
20:36:50.770 [debug] T2 received message from node_1_38: "world"
....
Finished in 2.3 seconds (2.3s async, 0.00s sync)
9 tests, 1 failure
the message is sending from t1 to t2, but not t2 to t1, can anyone explain me why the root cause is , i am not getting trying from past 4 hrs.
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Aludel - LLM Evaluation Workbench
Aludel is an embeddable Phoenix LiveView dashboard for evaluating and comparing LLM prompts across mult...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
jstimps
I wonder if the messages are being delivered to your acceptor process. The destination process for messages can be changed with :gen_tcp.controlling_process/2
soulglory
but one process is receiving the data, but other process is not receiving, that’s where i am stuck, i am sending through the same connection
jstimps
Your server uses a new acceptor process (via a
spawn_link/1instart_acceptor/2). This process is accepting the socket request from the client, and presumablyhandle_new_connection/2is working as expected for you?If so, try adding a call to
:gen_tcp.controlling_process/2in this location:This should transfer responsibility of the socket to the GenServer, and allow that GenServer process to receive the messages.
This differs from your TCP client-side implementation (at least I think so, I did not read in great detail), which connects and receives messages in the same process, so a change in the controlling process is not required.
al2o3cr
+1 for needing the call to
:gen_tcp.controlling_process- I tried it, and the test passes with it added.soulglory
can you just share the snippets
soulglory
It’s worked, thanks for the help.