soulglory

soulglory

Actually i am implement a raft in elixir, and i am working on tcp_transport now ,
these are my files
https://github.com/ProgMastermind/elixir_raft/blob/main/lib/elixir_raft/network/tcp_transport.ex
https://github.com/ProgMastermind/elixir_raft/blob/main/test/elixir_raft/network/tcp_transport_test.exs
but i am getting this error when i am running tests

 1) test basic TCP transport can connect and send messages bi-directionally (ElixirRaft.Network.TcpTransportTest)
     test/elixir_raft/network/tcp_transport_test.exs:51
     Assertion failed, no matching message after 2000ms
     The following variables were pinned:
       node2_id = "node_2_38"
     Showing 1 of 1 message in the mailbox
     code: assert_receive {:received_t1, ^node2_id, "hello"}
     mailbox:
       pattern: {:received_t1, ^node2_id, "hello"}
       value:   {:received_t2, "node_1_38", "world"}
     stacktrace:
       test/elixir_raft/network/tcp_transport_test.exs:101: (test)

     The following output was logged:
     
     20:36:50.514 [info] TCP Transport listening on port 35581
     
     20:36:50.615 [debug] Attempting to connect to node_1_38 at {0, 0, 0, 0}:35581
     
     20:36:50.616 [info] Processing inbound connection from node_2_38
     
     20:36:50.616 [info] Successfully established bi-directional connection to node_1_38
     
     20:36:50.616 [debug] Connection status - T1->T2: connected, T2->T1: connected
     
     20:36:50.717 [debug] Sending message from T2 to T1
     
     20:36:50.717 [debug] Successfully sent message to node_1_38
     
     20:36:50.768 [debug] Sending message from T1 to T2
     
     20:36:50.768 [debug] Successfully sent message to node_2_38
     
     20:36:50.770 [debug] T2 received message from node_1_38: "world"
     
....
Finished in 2.3 seconds (2.3s async, 0.00s sync)
9 tests, 1 failure

the message is sending from t1 to t2, but not t2 to t1, can anyone explain me why the root cause is , i am not getting trying from past 4 hrs.

Showing Posts 1 to 6

jstimps

jstimps

I wonder if the messages are being delivered to your acceptor process. The destination process for messages can be changed with :gen_tcp.controlling_process/2

soulglory

soulglory OP

but one process is receiving the data, but other process is not receiving, that’s where i am stuck, i am sending through the same connection

jstimps

jstimps

Your server uses a new acceptor process (via a spawn_link/1 in start_acceptor/2). This process is accepting the socket request from the client, and presumably handle_new_connection/2 is working as expected for you?

If so, try adding a call to :gen_tcp.controlling_process/2 in this location:

        case send_message(socket, encode_handshake(our_node_id)) do
          :ok ->
            :gen_tcp.controlling_process(socket, parent) # <-- try adding this
            GenServer.cast(parent, {:inbound_connection, socket, remote_node_id})
            {:ok, remote_node_id}
          error ->
            Logger.error("Failed to complete handshake: #{inspect(error)}")
            :gen_tcp.close(socket)
            error
        end

This should transfer responsibility of the socket to the GenServer, and allow that GenServer process to receive the messages.

This differs from your TCP client-side implementation (at least I think so, I did not read in great detail), which connects and receives messages in the same process, so a change in the controlling process is not required.

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

+1 for needing the call to :gen_tcp.controlling_process - I tried it, and the test passes with it added.

soulglory

soulglory OP

can you just share the snippets

soulglory

soulglory OP

It’s worked, thanks for the help.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
RemyXRenard
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
samoloth
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
FlyingNoodle
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
webofbits
Aludel - LLM Evaluation Workbench Aludel is an embeddable Phoenix LiveView dashboard for evaluating and comparing LLM prompts across mult...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews