ckhrysze
I really have no idea how popular or well known these benchmarks are, but I’ve been following TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks for some time. I was happy to see some elixir/erlang entries recently, but then concerned with their performance. Given that phoenix at least has a high error count, I imagine that is at least part of the issue. I intend to take a look when I both learn enough to feel useful and get the chance, but I’m posting it here in case there are others more able that have the bandwidth to improve things sooner.
I understand that abstract benchmarks are always of only limited use, and each project will have its own performance characteristics; but performing well in a 3rd party (and theoretically unbiased) suite like this could help with adoption.
Trending in Discussions
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
uranther
I was looking at these benchmarks too the other day. And I also noticed the high error rate on Phoenix’s benchmarks. It seems strange to me, like their server wasn’t setup right. It seems implausible that Phoenix could perform so poorly. The GitHub repo is here - I thought about pulling it down and running the benchmarks myself. For one thing, the version of Phoenix is out of date, so we could make a pull request to update those dependencies.
AstonJ
Agree about the extremely high error rate suggesting they have set something up wrong. You’d think they’d investigate first before publishing
ckhrysze
Many of the packages there are entirely by outside groups; that is part of the appeal to me actually, that those evangelizing their favorites can actually submit improvements.
mackenza
I saw on twitter a response from Chris McCord somewhere (Twitter, Reddit, HN, ?) that stated there were serious problems with the configuration and that they had submitted a PR to fix some issues and nothing had been done. Also there was some caveat to the numbers posted where they had their hardware decommissioned and scrambled to get it published which meant the frameworks got no time to tweak/fix stuff.
I would say the jury is WAY out on the legitimacy of the numbers.
perishabledave
I believe this is the comment you’re talking about:
Any reason why Elixir/Phoenix did so badly in Round 12 of Techempower benchmarks?
3even
169,526 errors?! Based on those benchmarks I might as well go back to Codeigniter.
mackenza
omg… I seriously lol’d. My wife was like WTF?
mkunikow
satb
Hot off the presses in the round 14 battle - TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks
Phoenix somewhere at the median line. I am not too crazy about these numbers. Just interesting to watch.
brightball
Nothing about that looks right