i-n-g-m-a-r

i-n-g-m-a-r

Running mix test on a new Phoenix installation (1.5.9) results in many “Function passed as a handler with ID’” messages.

Does anyone know whether this is a problem and how to solve it?

Thank you.

09:13:48.858 [info]  Function passed as a handler with ID {Phoenix.Logger, [:phoenix, :channel_handled_in]} is local function.
This mean that it is either anonymous function or capture of function without module specified. That may cause performance penalty when calling such handler. For more details see note in `telemetry:attach/4` documentation.

https://hexdocs.pm/telemetry/telemetry.html#attach-4

09:13:48.871 [info]  Function passed as a handler with ID {Phoenix.Logger, [:phoenix, :channel_joined]} is local function.
This mean that it is either anonymous function or capture of function without module specified. That may cause performance penalty when calling such handler. For more details see note in `telemetry:attach/4` documentation.

https://hexdocs.pm/telemetry/telemetry.html#attach-4

09:13:48.871 [info]  Function passed as a handler with ID {Phoenix.Logger, [:phoenix, :endpoint, :start]} is local function.
This mean that it is either anonymous function or capture of function without module specified. That may cause performance penalty when calling such handler. For more details see note in `telemetry:attach/4` documentation.

https://hexdocs.pm/telemetry/telemetry.html#attach-4

09:13:48.871 [info]  Function passed as a handler with ID {Phoenix.Logger, [:phoenix, :endpoint, :stop]} is local function.
This mean that it is either anonymous function or capture of function without module specified. That may cause performance penalty when calling such handler. For more details see note in `telemetry:attach/4` documentation.

https://hexdocs.pm/telemetry/telemetry.html#attach-4

09:13:48.872 [info]  Function passed as a handler with ID {Phoenix.Logger, [:phoenix, :error_rendered]} is local function.
This mean that it is either anonymous function or capture of function without module specified. That may cause performance penalty when calling such handler. For more details see note in `telemetry:attach/4` documentation.

https://hexdocs.pm/telemetry/telemetry.html#attach-4

09:13:48.872 [info]  Function passed as a handler with ID {Phoenix.Logger, [:phoenix, :router_dispatch, :start]} is local function.
This mean that it is either anonymous function or capture of function without module specified. That may cause performance penalty when calling such handler. For more details see note in `telemetry:attach/4` documentation.

https://hexdocs.pm/telemetry/telemetry.html#attach-4

09:13:48.872 [info]  Function passed as a handler with ID {Phoenix.Logger, [:phoenix, :socket_connected]} is local function.
This mean that it is either anonymous function or capture of function without module specified. That may cause performance penalty when calling such handler. For more details see note in `telemetry:attach/4` documentation.

https://hexdocs.pm/telemetry/telemetry.html#attach-4

Showing Posts 1 to 7

03juan

03juan

I just tried it on a fresh 1.5.9 install and don’t see those errors. Did you make any changes to the dependencies?

Out the box phx_new 1.5.9 depends on telemetry_poller v0.4 which would install v0.5.1, but the link in the errors suggests you’re using 1.0, which depends on telemetry 1.0, so you may have a version mismatch.

hauleth

hauleth

Update Phoenix.

Yes, I know whether it is problem - I have implemented that warning.

It can be problem in production as calling local captures between processes (and storing them in ETS) can be quite expensive due to BEAM guarantees about local calls. Remote captures (aka one in form of &module.function/arity) are much less expensive, as these are almost equivalent to just 3-ary tuple ({module, function, arity}). Phoenix used local captures there in the past, and now it is fixed.

03juan

03juan

If they want to use 1.5.9 to follow a book or tutorials, would it be easy to change where those calls are made? Or at least they can live with the warnings. Unless the intention is a production system, in which case definitely upgrade.

i-n-g-m-a-r

i-n-g-m-a-r OP

Below is the output for mix deps.update --all
My mix.exs file defines {:phoenix, "~> 1.5.9"}
The actual phoenix version seems to be phoenix 1.5.13
The messages remain the same.

  connection 1.1.0
  cowboy 2.9.0
  cowboy_telemetry 0.4.0
  cowlib 2.11.0
  db_connection 2.4.1
  decimal 2.0.0
  ecto 3.7.1
  ecto_sql 3.7.2
  elixir_uuid 1.2.1
  file_system 0.2.10
  gettext 0.19.1
  jason 1.3.0
  mime 2.0.2
  oban 2.11.1
  phoenix 1.5.13
  phoenix_ecto 4.4.0
  phoenix_html 2.14.3
  phoenix_live_dashboard 0.6.5
  phoenix_live_reload 1.3.3
  phoenix_live_view 0.17.7
  phoenix_pubsub 2.0.0
  plug 1.13.3
  plug_cowboy 2.5.2
  plug_crypto 1.2.2
  postgrex 0.16.2
  ranch 1.8.0
  telemetry 1.0.0
  telemetry_metrics 0.6.1
  telemetry_poller 1.0.0

03juan

03juan

Yes if the project was initialised with phoenix 1.5.x and now you’ve upgraded telemetry to 1.0 and live_view to 0.17 then why not upgrade to phoenix 1.6 as per @hauleth?

i-n-g-m-a-r

i-n-g-m-a-r OP

Thank you both, that works.

It didn’t occur to me that mix phx.new would not install the latest version.
I should pay better attention.

03juan

03juan

You need to upgrade the phx_new package from hex every time a new Phoenix version is released.

 mix archive.install hex phx_new latest

Or at least before you start a new project.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
kszambelanczyk
Hello! Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app. I creat...
New
RemyXRenard
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
samoloth
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
FlyingNoodle
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
ryanwinchester
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted” Version...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews