Awlexus
Hi, I’m getting the following error message in my tests, and I’m not sure where they come from. I can’t see any difference to Tesla.Mock — tesla v1.20.0, except for async: true, but setting that to false doesn’t change anything.
I have other tests in the same project that also use Tesla.Mock, which don’t have this problem, and I couldn’t find a difference there either. Mocking works when I use mock_global and async: false, but that breaks a lot of other testcases, so that’s not an option.
I have 2 tests that fail because of this. They both reference the same process #PID<0.902.0> in the error message
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
above_mock: #PID<0.914.0>
above_post: #PID<0.914.0>
1) test ... (...)
test/my_app/redacted_test.exs:292
** (Tesla.Mock.Error) There is no mock set for process #PID<0.902.0>.
Use Tesla.Mock.mock/1 to mock HTTP requests.
See https://github.com/teamon/tesla#testing
stacktrace:
(tesla 1.8.0) lib/tesla/mock.ex:206: Tesla.Mock.call/2
(tesla 1.8.0) lib/tesla/middleware/timeout.ex:59: anonymous fn/1 in Tesla.Middleware.Timeout.safe_async/2
(elixir 1.15.7) lib/task/supervised.ex:101: Task.Supervised.invoke_mfa/2
(elixir 1.15.7) lib/task/supervised.ex:36: Task.Supervised.reply/4
# config
config :tesla, adapter: Tesla.Mock
# Test file
def MyApp.RedactedTest do
use MyApp.DataCase, async: true
import Tesla.Mock
setup :general_setup
describe "describe" do
test "..." do
IO.inspect(self(), label: :above_mock)
mock(fn _ -> json(%{translations: []}) end)
call_tesla_deep_in_this_function()
end
end
end
# Implementation
defmodule MyApp.Client do
def client(opts) do
middlewares = [...]
Tesla.client(middlewares)
end
def call_service(client, body) do
IO.inspect(self(), label: :above_post)
Tesla.post(client, "path", body)
end
end
# call_service is called like this
client = Client.client([...])
body = "body here"
Client.call_service(client, body)
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app?
Looking for hints regarding:
Addi...
New
Kia ora,
We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps.
Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
Hello,
I have an Elixir backend that implements a custom protocol over TCP. I want to load test the backend and assess the performance o...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #ai
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All Posts (oldest first)
- Show All Posts (newest first)
JohnnyCurran
Is the code under test performing the http request from a
Taskor from aGenServer? Those process pids will not have the Tesla mocked call available to them.I have solved this with a combo of
mock_globalandasync: falsein the test file. This means it doesn’t step on my async tests. You will need to use bothmock_globalandasync: falseon each test file where this error appears if you are unable (or don’t want to due to requirements) refactor the http call to happen in a different processAwlexus
There is no
TaskorGenServerinvolved. The first 2 lines of my code block show that the mock and the http request happen in the same process. It’s deeply nested, but it happens immediately after.JohnnyCurran
Can you up your stack trace length / post the full stack trace? It seems like the mock call is coming from a task:
Awlexus
Unfortunately, this already is the full stack track provided by the test. I didn’t touch the default values of the length, so it should already be the whole stack trace