fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks

I have discovered something curious: when one test macro creates a row, that row is still visible to another test. I only noticed this occurring because this particular schema is dealing with user-generated primary keys (sort of an ersatz enum – it’s a very small table).

I’m doing a full drop and create before my test runs, so I know that the data isn’t stuck in there from some other process. Here’s my alias from mix.exs:

defp aliases do
  [
    test: ["ecto.drop", "ecto.create", "ecto.migrate", "run priv/repo/seeds.exs", "test"]
  ]
end

I feel like this might be something like threads getting crossed… e.g. if test1 creates a record with primary key “X”, then test2 attempts to create a record with primary key “X”, there’s a problem.

1) test update/2 returns :ok when updating an existing thing (MyApp.Contexts.ThingContextTest)
     test/contexts/thing_context_test.exs:53
     ** (Ecto.ConstraintError) constraint error when attempting to insert struct:

         * thing_pkey (unique_constraint)

     If you would like to stop this constraint violation from raising an
     exception and instead add it as an error to your changeset, please
     call `unique_constraint/3` on your changeset with the constraint
     `:name` as an option.

     The changeset defined the following constraints:

         * thing_id_index (unique_constraint)

     code: status_fixture(%{
     stacktrace:
       (ecto) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:689: anonymous fn/4 in Ecto.Repo.Schema.constraints_to_errors/3
       (elixir) lib/enum.ex:1327: Enum."-map/2-lists^map/1-0-"/2
       (ecto) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:674: Ecto.Repo.Schema.constraints_to_errors/3
       (ecto) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:276: anonymous fn/15 in Ecto.Repo.Schema.do_insert/3
       test/contexts/wholesale_partner_status_context_test.exs:55: (test)

I haven’t run up against this exact behavior even though I’ve done the same type of thing for other modules (i.e. with string primary keys), so I thought maybe it had something to do with how the application was started? My test helper is simply doing ExUnit.start() and I’m doing a simple use ExUnit.Case (no async).

If I run the tests in the module 1 at a time, they all pass, e.g. mix test test/contexts/thing_test.exs:66

Any ideas?

Many thanks for any pointers!

Showing Posts 1 to 8

NobbZ

NobbZ

Have you sandboxing enabled for ecto?

fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks OP

I think so. This is my test config:

use Mix.Config

config :myapp,
  MyApp.Repo,
  username: System.get_env("DB_USER") || "postgres",
  password: System.get_env("DB_PASS") || "",
  database: System.get_env("DB") || "myapp_test",
  hostname: System.get_env("DB_HOST") || "127.0.0.1",
  pool: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox
fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks OP

AHA. I Found it. I had copied and pasted the WRONG repo in my test:

setup do
  :ok = Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.checkout(WrongThing.Repo)
end

Should have been

setup do
  :ok = Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.checkout(Thing.Repo)
end
axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team

Also I’m pretty sure that a :pool config on the repo doesn’t do anything you should probably drop the pool: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox option from there.

NobbZ

NobbZ

AFAIR this is how it falls out of the generators…

axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team
NobbZ

NobbZ

Its from the generator, but as it seems not from the templates:

$ mix phx.new foo
$ tail -6 foo/config/test.exs
config :foo, Foo.Repo,
  username: "postgres",
  password: "postgres",
  database: "foo_test",
  hostname: "localhost",
  pool: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox
axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team

Ah, I see. :pool is configuration for Ecto.Adapters.Postgres: Ecto.Adapters.Postgres — Ecto SQL v3.14.0

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Cxx-mlr
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution: data = %{ name: "Periodic Table", category:...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews