samuelludwig
- I have a function (
myfun/1) that takes in a list of characters, and depending on the characters in the list, returns a list of named functions (that are defined in the same module)–which will be applied at a later time.
Enum.reduce(com_chars, [], fn x, acc ->
case x do
"." -> [&to_lowercase/1 | acc]
"^" -> [&to_uppercase/1 | acc]
_ -> [:error | acc]
end
end)
|> Enum.reverse()
- when I test this function in ExUnit (after importing MyMod) with
assert myfun([".", "^"]) == [&to_lowercase/1, &to_uppercase/1], the test fails for the following reasons:- in the test,
&to_lowercase/1and&to_uppercase/1are expanded to&MyMod.the_function/1 myfunseems to return a list of lambdas and not the named functions:[#Function..., #Function...]
- in the test,
- I can get around this if I use fully qualified names in
myfun, however this does not work if I pass in a function with a set argument, like&get_slice(&1, "[0-5]"). In this case the function shows up as a lambda on both sides of the assert (and not the same lambda either).
My question is: how exactly should I be testing functions that return other functions?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted”
Version...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
benwilson512
I think perhaps instead of returning a real function you could return an atom that you later use
applywith or even just pattern match and call the right function directly. If you need to have values included you could return a tuple of{:function_atom, [list, of, args]}.samuelludwig
That’s a little unfortunate; to only be able to test at the cost of readability.
lucaong
On the other hand, tuples like
{module, function, arguments}are very idiomatic ways in Elixir (and Erlang) to pass around functions. They even have their own type (mfa, for module function arguments).dimitarvp
Function references aren’t compared by value or which function do they point at so you’re out of luck here.
I’d also recommend you don’t return direct function references but rather a structure that describes how to call the function later. A MFA would indeed be perfect as @lucaong said, and they can easily be compared with each other where the same module/function/arguments combo will compare equal to another identical combo.