filip-rybczynski

filip-rybczynski

Hello!

I’m still a newcomer to Elixir and Phoenix, I’ve only started using them early this year. So asking kindly for understanding if the question I ask turns out to be trivial :sweat_smile:

The app I’m now working on in my project has several buttons which serve as links to patch the current LiveView (which results in UI changes, e.g. tab change in a menu). In its simplest form, the pattern is as follows:

<.link patch={~p(/users/#{@id}/edit)}>
  <.button>
    Edit
  </.button>
</.link>

The issue I’m currently facing is how to properly test such components - specifically, how to test that pressing this link will result in a patch as expected. Basically, I’d like to test the following series of events: (1) open view → (2) assert some html → (3) click link → (4) assert patch → (5) assert some different html. So step #3 is where I’m currently stuck at.

render_click won’t do in this case, since the Phoenix.Component.link/1 component does not have a phx-click attribute. Looking through the Phoenix.LiveViewTest documentation, I didn’t find anything that seems to work specifically for links.

Of course, the two less-than-satisfying options that come to mind now are:

  1. Not test interacting with the link directly and just simulate the resulting patch with render_patch/2 (seems like this reduces test reliability since the patch link is dynamic, dependent on assigns)
  2. Replace all instances of the above pattern with regular buttons with phx-click, and trigger the patch in the event handler (much better option from test reliability perspective, but modifying app code solely for testing purposes is probably not ideal, unless necessary)

But before I go with either option I wanted to ask here - is there any way to test patch navigations triggered by Phoenix link components in LiveViewTest that I’m missing?

Showing Posts 1 to 3

sodapopcan

sodapopcan

Hello and welcome to Elixir Forum!

render_click should absolutely work on a <.link> component. Are you using element first?

lv
|> element("#my-link")
|> render_click()

assert_patch(lv, ~p"/users/#{@id}/edit")

assert render(lv) =~ "some html"

Also, just in case you weren’t aware, assuming you have a @user assign you don’t need to bother assigning @id as well, you can pass an Ecto struct to verified routes and it knows to use its id:

patch={~p(/users/#{@user}/edit)}
filip-rybczynski

filip-rybczynski OP

Hey, thanks for your response!

You are absolutely correct. I wrote this post because I kept getting a (paraphrasing) “element does not have phx-click attribute” error, but apparently it was because I had an issue with my selector in element - I used a straightforward id this time and now it works!

Of course, now that it works I noticed that there is the below clear paragraph in the docs:

If the element does not have a phx-click attribute but it is a link (the <a> tag), the link will be followed accordingly

So if I just read a bit more, I’d realize the issue was somewhere else, and not with render-click. Lesson for the future, I guess. Thanks for taking the time to help out!

As to your second point - I simplified the code snippet, we use @user.id, but I was actually unaware of the option of passing an Ecto struct to verified routes. I’d like to read more about it, is this what you’re referring to? Phoenix.Param — Phoenix v1.8.8

sodapopcan

sodapopcan

Yep! Derive Phoenix.Param to use another field. It’s legit to do @user.id too but it does make refactoring much easier if you ever want to switch to @user.slug or something.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews