seanhandley
While writing mocks for an Elixir test suite, I found that mock_with sets up a global mock object which prevents you from safely being able to set a test as async: true.
We’ve been using Mox reliably to mock out our own internal code by setting the @callback attribute on methods we wish to mock, thus treating them as behaviours.
The trouble we’ve hit is when we need to mock a third party module, e.g. Redix (a Redis client). We can patch their library with the relevant @callback attributes, but is there a better and cleaner way to implement unobtrusive, async-friendly mocks for third party code?
It’d be awesome to get a community consensus on this!
Where Next?
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #phoenix_html
- #elixirconf-us
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Error tracking, logs, uptime, and Just Enough APM. Built for developers.
Practical resources that improve the lives of professional developers.
Master modern tools, write cleaner code, and tackle real-world challenges.
Bringing learning, work and compliance together since 1987.
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"
Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
benwilson512
You could always add your own
Redisbehaviour and then haveRedixsimply be one possible implementation of it. IE, mockMyApp.Redis`` instead of mockingRedix`. That’s what I’ve done for stuff at least.OvermindDL1
In my opinion, mocking should never ever be done, instead anything that might be mocked should instead be passed into the modules and functions that use it, that way at test time you can pass in something different, this way you retain full async and no surprises about where things come from (plus you might find later that you suddenly need different implementations of something!).
HansKenis
But passing something in at test time, isn’t that what would make it a Mock/Stub?
And passing it it, could happen with several strategies. Could be a parameter on the function, could be set by config, … It depends on the use case what would be the best strategy, but in both cases Mox is a nice helper, in my opinion. It saves some boilerplate code.
We also create our own behaviour mostly
MyApp.Redixand then create a wrapper,MyApp.Redix.Wrapperwhich implement the functions typically as oneliners.OvermindDL1
Not necessarily, passing things in mean it is pluggable, meaning you can easily change the implementation later if you need to as wlel.
dch
great approach, maybe you can link to an example of this for people to refer to.
I’d also suggest that you can use mix environments to load the different behaviours in each environment, nicely captured here Mocks and explicit contracts « Plataformatec Blog
seanhandley
Thanks for all the great responses folks!