AstonJ
Saw this and wondered what each stage could or might mean for Elixir - anyone given it any thought?
What kind of impact do you think it will have on languages like Elixir and Erlang, or programming in general?
Trending in AI / LLMs
This showed up on my feed.. anyone heard of it? Just hype?
Ox Alpha is a reasoning model designed for coding, sustained ag...
New
It’s not that it’s vocabulary is too advanced. It’s something worse.
I get lost trying to follow even a paragraph written by Claude. It’...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
With advancements in AI gathering pace and set to increasingly accelerate, perhaps it’s worth having an annual thread on the topic - feel...
New
What
A larger rant at in this post. Code at github: GitHub - dmitriid/llamex: Credo Plugin that detects issues that LLM-assisted Elixir r...
New
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
mudasobwa
There is no evidence of a possibility of the quantum transition
[Multi-]Agentic→AGI.The evolution of a jellyfish might end up being Einstein, or it might have stayed the stinging muck in coastal waters forever.
AstonJ
What if… tho?
And what are the odds given our current trajectory? (Are those stages plausible? Or not?)
Ultimately, is progress inevitable (if we don’t annihilate ourselves)?
DaAnalyst
What if? We’re all out of job, that’s what if.
DaAnalyst
Progress is inevitable, but we do not even know what is required to achieve AGI.
But the funny thing about the video is that they stacked up those three bottom stages we’ve practically already achieved (won’t get into if and how actually useful and to whom) and then then simply continued linearly to AGI, kinda a like:
AstonJ
Worth keeping an eye on https://www.stateof.ai - I’m not sure the jump between 3 and 4 is as big as you might think it is, but admit it’s difficult to say right now.
The State Of AI survey is worth a look in terms of general AI use…
mudasobwa
mudasobwa
Once again: there is zero evidence this jump is ever possible.
AstonJ
Is progress inevitable? If so does that mean it’ll not just be possible, but likely?
To me your comment is a little bit like “single cell organisms would never (or be highly unlikely to) evolve into general intelligence (humans)”
olivermt
To me its more like science people behind what makes LLM possible says that leap is not likely nor possible.
DaAnalyst
It’s not like that. We’re currently using GPUs to multiply the matrices, but it’s not because we’ve come to the conclusion that it’s optimal for pattern matching but because that’s the tech we had on hand to simulate what we believe may come closer to what we believe (again) is how our brains pattern match.
That’s not evolution. That’s just entrepreneurship.