AstonJ

AstonJ

I’m glad José posted the below in another thread as I was starting to get a little confused after hearing them being referred to as methods:

Methods are found in Object Orientated Programming (Elixir is a functional programming language), here’s how they differ courtesy of this Stack Overflow question:

A function is a piece of code that is called by name. It can be passed data to operate on (i.e. the parameters) and can optionally return data (the return value). All data that is passed to a function is explicitly passed.

A method is a piece of code that is called by a name that is associated with an object. In most respects it is identical to a function except for two key differences:

  1. A method is implicitly passed the object on which it was called.
  • A method is able to operate on data that is contained within the class (remembering that an object is an instance of a class - the class is the definition, the object is an instance of that data).

(This is a simplified explanation, ignoring issues of scope etc.)

Hopefully this thread will help save someone else from falling into the trap of thinking of them as methods.

Showing Posts 1 to 5

sashaafm

sashaafm

What’s the definition of “operating on data”? If it means changing data then I agree. However, if it means also reading data, then what about config vars and module attributes? Those are not explicitly passed onto Elixir functions and can be read.

peerreynders

peerreynders

Frankly, when and if you have a chance - correct them. Postel’s law is great in software but when it comes to human communication sloppiness resulting from “you know what I mean” tolerance seems to be cumulative over time ultimately resulting in statements that completely obfuscate the intended meaning.

That being said it needs the be recognized that “method” really refers to a function playing a particular role. Many moons ago I wasn’t allowed to use C++ on a particular project - so I resorted to C Interfaces and Implementations (1996) tactics which allowed me to be quasi-OO with just functions and structs. This is exactly the trap that Dave Thomas warns about in Programming Elixir 1.3 p.91:

Structs in particular might lead you into the darkness because you can associate functions with them in their module definitions. At some point, the old object-orientation neurons still active in the nether regions of your brain might burst into life and you might think, “Hey, this is a bit like a class definition.” And you’d be right. You can write something akin to object-oriented code using structs (or maps) and modules.

This is a bad idea. Not because objects are intrinsically bad, but because you’ll be mixing paradigms and diluting the benefits a functional approach gives you
.
Stay pure, young coder. Stay pure.

So even in the absence of methods inside the language, functions can still be used in method-like manner (topic of this recent discussion) which can be an even more insidious problem.

AstonJ

AstonJ OP

I think the SO answer is general, and we could probably make some changes to make it more applicable to functional programming. Perhaps we could have a stab at re-writing it from Elixir’s perspective?

Functions vs Methods in Elixir

There are no methods in Elixir because methods are related to Object Orientated Programming. Here’s how they differ:

A function is a piece of code that can be called to run. It can be passed data to operate on (i.e. the parameters) and can optionally return data. In Elixir and other immutable languages, this data is a new copy of that data and not a modified version of what was passed into it. All data that is passed to a function is explicitly passed.

A method on the other hand is a piece of code that is called by a name that is associated with an object (which we do not have in Elixir). Methods differ from functions in two key ways:

  • A method is implicitly passed the object on which it was called.
  • A method is able to operate on data that is contained within the class (remembering that an object is an instance of a class - the class is the definition, the object is an instance of that data).

Feel free to quote/edit/expand :003:

AstonJ

AstonJ OP

I agree @peerreynders - I really like that quote from Dave too, it’s a good reminder that OOP and Functional are different paradigms.

andre1sk

andre1sk

they are copied at compile time so it’s just a shorthand for defining it in place

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Discussions Top

cblavier
Hey there, It’s been more than a year since we started using LiveView as our main UI library and building a whole library of UI componen...
515 12931 101
New
wmnnd
Hey folks, I wanted to share with you a project I’ve been working on for a while: It’s an Open Source (AGPLv3) newsletter tool. Think Ma...
New
raa-ziq
Hi everyone :waving_hand: I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
sntran
In my third year of college, around 2010, I found Erlang. A few years later, I found Elixir. I liked the ideas at once: many small proces...
New
Ganna
Hi everyone, I have 8 years of production experience with Erlang/OTP and I’m just starting to get to know Elixir. What would you learn f...
New
gtcode
I’ve been tinkering with Lynx (by José) via hold_ledger. I used AI to write the code, a separate specification, the tests, and the Lean p...
New
AstonJ
A remark @Garrison made… ..has already inspired a thread for the technical side of reclaiming our internet, but there is of course anot...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
kip
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews