RazgrizHsu

RazgrizHsu

Hi, all,

i’m trying compare with timex variables,
but i don’t know why this code work like that..


dts = Timex.parse!( "2019-01-01T00:00:00.000Z", "{ISO:Extended:Z}" )
now = Timex.parse!( "2019-01-01T00:00:00.100Z", "{ISO:Extended:Z}" )

dt = Timex.shift( dts, seconds: 5 )
	
if ( dt <= now ) do
	raise ( "why? dt already shift seconds... dt[#{ inspect dt }] now[#{ inspect now }]" )
else
	:ok
end

I thought that such a comparison should be the opposite result…

anyone can help me to understand this? thanks

Showing Posts 1 to 5

NobbZ

NobbZ

You need to use Timex.compare/2/3 instead of Kernel.<=/2.

kip

kip

ex_cldr Core Team

The built in comparison operators aren’t the right tool for this job. You probably want to use Timex.compare/3.

For an explanation of why this is the case you might find this useful. Especially this quote:

Maps are compared by size, then by keys in ascending term order, then by values in key order. In the specific case of maps’ key ordering, integers are always considered to be less than floats.

RazgrizHsu

RazgrizHsu OP

okay thank you guys,

so i need change my code to

#if ( dt <= now ) do
#instead by
compared = Timex.compare( dt, now )
if ( compared == 0 || compared == -1 ) do

right?

@kip thank you for explanation :smiley:

i was wrong a test to make sure my project working… but seem not work :smile:

test "compare with operations" do
	
	#equal
	a = Timex.parse!( "2017-01-01T01:00:00.751Z", "{ISO:Extended:Z}" )
	b = Timex.parse!( "2017-01-01T01:00:00.751Z", "{ISO:Extended:Z}" )
	assert( a == b )
	assert( ( a < b ) == false )
	assert( ( a > b ) == false )
	assert( ( a <= b ) == true )
	assert( ( a >= b ) == true )
	
	#offset 1ms
	a = Timex.parse!( "2017-01-01T01:00:00.750Z", "{ISO:Extended:Z}" )
	b = Timex.parse!( "2017-01-01T01:00:00.751Z", "{ISO:Extended:Z}" )
	assert( ( a == b ) == false )
	assert( ( a < b )  == true )
	assert( ( a > b )  == false )
	assert( ( a <= b ) == true )
	assert( ( a >= b ) == false )
	
	#offset 5secs
	a = Timex.parse!( "2019-01-01T00:00:00.000Z", "{ISO:Extended:Z}" )
	a = Timex.parse!( "2019-01-01T00:00:05.000Z", "{ISO:Extended:Z}" )
	assert( ( a == b ) == false )
	assert( ( a < b )  == true )
	assert( ( a > b )  == false )
	assert( ( a <= b ) == true )
	assert( ( a >= b ) == false )
end

I need to add this paragraph to remind me of myself :smile:

#Tips: the operation compare will fail with milliseconds, instead by Timex.compare
a = Timex.parse!( "2019-01-01T00:00:05.000Z", "{ISO:Extended:Z}" )
b = Timex.parse!( "2019-01-01T00:00:00.100Z", "{ISO:Extended:Z}" )

assert( ( a == b ) == false )
assert( ( a <= b ) == true )	# it's wrong, normally it's should be false

thanks guys :slight_smile:

NobbZ

NobbZ

I tend to always use the regular comparison operators against 0.

Timex.compare(start, end) <= 0

This does match semantics very well.

RazgrizHsu

RazgrizHsu OP

This is indeed a very good suggestion, thank you :smiley:

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews