stephane
After the great work done in phx_gen_auth, I was wondering if it would be possible to modify phx_gen_auth to support --no-html to generate a token based authentication instead of the session based authentication. (Support --no-html · Issue #38 · aaronrenner/phx_gen_auth · GitHub)
I started a little draft (Auth api by StephaneRob · Pull Request #1 · StephaneRob/mix_phx_gen_api_auth_demo · GitHub) from a new phoenix application where I generated the session based authentication with phx_gen_auth, and tried to convert it to a token based authentication.
But as there is a lot work to adapt the generator (and certainly out of the scope of phx_gen_auth), I would like to know if there is a need/interest for a dedicated generator?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
thojanssens1
The session based authentication works with tokens. Can you give a little more precision?
kokolegorille
Usually You do not treat authentification for an API the same as You would for a full Phoenix project.
For an API it is common to add a token in the header for each request. It is then decoded into auth info server side…
It is not the same, but You can use plug to solve both, except the authentication is managed differently.
But I have not really tried phx_gen_auth, just once… and it did install controllers, templates and views. This is not required for a JSON API.
stephane
Yes, my idea was to adapt the generator to remove templates files, and return json instead. On login a token is returned with other information like user email.
The main difference is that this token need to be sent for each request by the front application, and need to be fetch in the authorization header by the server.
The remember me cookie is used as refresh cookie to refresh the session via the /users/me enpoint to allow the front application to fetch an access token.
thojanssens1
Not really. It has been since long discouraged to store the token in local-/sessionStorage (xss attacks).
I have a project based on Absinthe/GraphQL and cookies work just fine.
It is better to compare the means of transport of the token, i.e. localStorage+HTTP header VS Cookie.
“Session vs token” makes little sense to me.
If you still need to add the token in the header, I’d like to know why. Cross domain requests?
LostKobrakai
If you use cookies you’re still likely in a “webapplication using the api” context and less likely in a mobile app or even server to server type communication context. For the latter there’s neither xss nor csrf possibility if I understand those correctly. Your suggestion is certainly correct for a web context, but that’s not all the things interacting with apis.
stephane
@LostKobrakai, yes it’s exactly the use case I’m interested in. Be able to consume an API easily from different devices.
@thojanssens1 agree that it’s discouraged to store token in local/session storage. The token returned by the API should be kept in memory (react context, redux state, vuex…).
LostKobrakai
In memory in a js context is just as unsafe to xss attacks as local/session storage. Anything accessable to js is prone to such attacks. The only save solution is a http(s)_only cookie, which can’t be read by the js runtime.
stephane
I think that it’s not really as unsafe as local/session storage, because the token doesn’t stay in the browser.
The refresh cookie is stored as http_only cookie.
LostKobrakai
If your js runtime has access to your token so has an attacker exploiting an xss vulnerability.
stephane
You’re right ! the only safe place would be an http only cookie.