codez
A project I am working on now has strong security requirements. Therefore I would like to have a layered approach that provides guard-rails at several levels. In the past I did development with the Python based Zope application server. This server has the notion of traversal.
Traversal is an alternative to pattern based routing. This cuts the URL into path components and then looks up an item from the database. It then uses that to traverse to the second path component and so on until the components all are processed.
The nice thing about this traversal concept is that it allows for authorization checks to be applied during the traversal phase. This can make sure that it would be impossible to access sub-paths if access is denied at a higher level.
I think I can replicate this concept in Phoenix. What I am wondering about is if this makes sense or if there are better options to do this kind of thing. As a concrete example of an URL:
/organizations/mega-corp/projects/secret-X/tools/profitinator/...
This could also be modelled (with traversal) as:
/organizations/mega-corp/secret-X/profitinator/...
I’m fine with either of those, just interested in the security aspect. With traversal (in both versions) it would be possible to limit access to sub-paths of mega-corp to employees. A similar thing can be done when traversing secret-X and so on.
For more background on the traversal mechanism in Python based frameworks:
Where Next?
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Latest Phoenix Threads
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #hex
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Error tracking, logs, uptime, and Just Enough APM. Built for developers.
Elixir, Erlang & BEAM conferences from Code Sync - join us in 2026!
Practical resources that improve the lives of professional developers.
Bringing learning, work and compliance together since 1987.
**Building the future of software with AI, trust, and human connection.**
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"
Showing Posts 1 to 1- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
LostKobrakai
This is not how
Plug.RouternorPhoenix.Routerwork. They’re so fast in matching routes exactly because they harness plain old pattern matching below the hood. This is not to say you cannot get the same level of security from them. Withscopesandpipelinesyou can prevent access in a similar manner. Only the router won’t be able to resume matching if being prevented from access for an previously matched route.You can also build a custom router. In the end routers are just plugs, which receive a conn and some opts and dispatch to controllers, which also are just plugs (
MyController.call(conn, action)). But keep in mind that this will likely mean you cannot use phoenix liveview. It’s deeply integrated with the router level.