sodapopcan
Types 'n' Testing
After re-watching José’s keynote from last year, he brought up that he believes that reducing the number of tests you need to write is not something that typing brings to the table. This really hit home as it’s something I’ve suspected for a very long time now. For the eight months I was forced to use dialyzer at work, it changed absolutely nothing about how I wrote tests. Searching the internet has been of little help because it’s very easy to find a lot of accounts of people making this claim (sometimes claiming the test count reduction is significant) but almost always without example. The best I’ve found are tests whose sole purpose are to assert on the types.
Can anyone provide any insight here? If not it’s cool if this post slips, unanswered, into oblivion. If I get some examples of tests I wouldn’t write anyway, I have no plans to jump in and lecture why I wouldn’t write them. I’m more interested in uncovering a hole in my testing strategy. I’ve been working solo for over a year, now, (and previously at a company that wasn’t big on TDD) so I don’t have anyone to riff on this stuff with at work.
I also don’t want this turning into another debate on the merits of static typing. We did that already 
Most Liked
stefanchrobot
From my experience as a solo dev, the most important tests are black-box integration-level tests that exercise the public contract of the app (UI if it’s a web app, the APIs if it’s a backend service). These tests are implementation-agnostic, so whether I’m using types or not has zero effect on them.
My app is a server-side rendered Phoenix app. I’m testing it by making multiple HTTP requests and asserting on the content of the responses. I have 173 of those tests plus 9 doctests and my suite takes ~6s to run. I threw away all other tests (no unit tests for schema or contexts). This gives me immense freedom in refactoring and rewriting the code.
josevalim
My main point is that if your tests can be replaced by types, I would argue they are most likely tests not worth writing anyway. For example, I rarely see the purpose in checking for FunctionClausError (and similar).
On the flip side, believing types replaces tests (and docs), will lead you to lacking tests (and lacking docs). 
stefanchrobot
I don’t love complex type systems. My preference is for the types to fit the testing trophy, which to me means that the purpose of the types is to give the quickest feedback possible (right in the IDE) that something is off, before the code is even run. From that perspective, types supplement the developer’s experience.
Last Post!
dimitarvp
Too much a generalization for my taste but in general you’re not wrong: we’re gonna replace easy-ish correctable programmer bugs with somewhat harder to spot theorem [proving] bugs. 
This is why I am not very fond of the more formal and super strict languages like Coq / Idris / Agda et. al. They sound really good in theory but in practice, most programmers are not mathematicians (though it’s not a bad idea for all of us to be, if you ask me, but we all know it’s not happening en masse for sure).
Languages like Rust and OCaml (likely Haskell as well but I am not familiar with it) are doing just fine and IMO they are striking a golden middle.
Popular in Discussions
Other popular topics
Chat & Discussions>Discussions
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #blog-post
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #ai
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #elixirconf-us
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #forms
- #api
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Error tracking for Elixir devs who love to ship. Start your free account.
Practical resources that improve the lives of professional developers.
Develop your skills with books, videos, and courses.
Producing high quality Elixir screencasts since 2017.
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"