unlogic

unlogic

I have a Phoenix application that is provides a standard REST API. I currently have two models and am looking at unit-testing. One of my controller’s unit tests is passing fine, but the other is showing some off behaviour in the update and create tests.

  • Update with valid data isn’t updating the data and returns {"errors":{"comment":["can't be blank"],"control":["can't be blank"],"value":["can't be blank"]}}
  • Update with invalid data isn’t erroring and returning the entry
  • Create with valid data is doing what the invalid case should do and returning 422 with {"errors":{"comment":["can't be blank"],"control":["can't be blank"],"value":["can't be blank"]}}

These are generated tests, as are those for the other controller which are working fine. I’d be OK with this if the controller wasn’t working as expected, but when running the queries manually from a REST client, the application behaves as expected in all three cases.

Here’s the

Note that I have dropped the ["data"] part of the response. This is the case for the other controller too, where the tests are passing fine.

Showing Posts 1 to 5

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

Can you post the controller code? The link labeled “Controller” above is actually a schema module.

I have zero evidence to support this, but my suspicion is that the controller doesn’t agree with the test about what key to use in the params.

unlogic

unlogic OP

Sorry, that was the wrong paste

So if I understand your comment correctly, it’s not using the correct primary key? I’m just very confused about why these three test cases aren’t working as expected, but they are the same as the other model/controller I have set up.

thanks for the help so far though

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

  def create(conn, job_control_params) do

Try dumping out what you’re getting in job_control_params here when you run the tests. Does it match what JobControls.create_job_control/1 expects?

I don’t believe it will: create_job_control is called from fixture(:job_control) with parameters shaped like

%{comment: ..., control: ..., value: ...}

but in the tests this code:

    test "renders job_control when data is valid", %{conn: conn} do
      conn = post(conn, Routes.job_control_path(conn, :create), job_control: @create_attrs)

will pass (unless use FarmqWeb, :controller is doing something nonstandard) parameters shaped like:

%{"job_control" => %{"comment" => ..., "control" => ..., "value" => ...}}

cast will ignore parameters it doesn’t understand, so it will filter out ALL the input here.

A typical idiom in controller actions looks like:

  def create(conn, %{"job_control" => job_control_params}) do
    with {:ok, %JobControl{} = job_control} <- JobControls.create_job_control(job_control_params) do

...


  def update(conn, %{"id" => id, "job_control" => job_control_params}) do
    job_control = JobControls.get_job_control!(id)

    with {:ok, %JobControl{} = job_control} <- JobControls.update_job_control(job_control, job_control_params) do
unlogic

unlogic OP

I forgot to mention that I updated the original comment with the controller code. The controller code is the same for this controller as well as the other one. I also think that I didn’t edit the create function either.

So I think that the update function is as expected. I printed the contents of job_control_params and it’s what I’d expect it to be

I’d be less confused if my other controller/tests didn’t pass and if using the API via a client wasn’t working as expected

unlogic

unlogic OP

Found the issue. You were absolutely correct in your assumption about the controller being odd. For whatever reason, in the erroring controller I had

def update(conn, job_control_params) do
instead of
def update(conn, %{"job_control" => job_control_params}) do

Same for the create function. Not sure why it was like this but I’ve fixed it now and the tests pass.

Thanks for the help!

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
kszambelanczyk
Hello! Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app. I creat...
New
RemyXRenard
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
samoloth
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
FlyingNoodle
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
ryanwinchester
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted” Version...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge &amp; Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews