fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks

I’m new to Elixir and Phoenix and I’m trying to implement Cachex. I’m struggling to get this working. I added the dependency to my mix.exs and I modified my application function so it references the Cachex app:

def application do
    [
      mod: {MyApp.Application, []},
      extra_applications: [:logger, :runtime_tools],
      applications: [:cachex]
    ]
  end

deps.get downloaded the package and that all seems to be working.

In my application.ex, I have tried to add the appropriate block to the Supervisor.start_link:

  def start(_type, _args) do
    import Supervisor.Spec

    # Define workers and child supervisors to be supervised
    children = [
      supervisor(MyApp.Repo, []),
      supervisor(MyApp.Endpoint, []),
      worker(Cachex, [:my_cache, []]),
    ]

    opts = [strategy: :one_for_one, name: MyApp.Supervisor]
    Supervisor.start_link(children, opts)
    
  end

As soon as I try to run the server, I get an error:

mix phx.server
Compiling 16 files (.ex)
Generated my_app app

=INFO REPORT==== 12-Feb-2018::15:32:28 ===
    application: logger
    exited: stopped
    type: temporary
** (Mix) Could not start application my_app: MyApp.Application.start(:normal, []) returned an error: shutdown: failed to start child: MyApp.Repo
    ** (EXIT) exited in: GenServer.call(Ecto.Registry, {:associate, #PID<0.367.0>, {MyApp.Repo, MyApp.Repo.Pool, [name: MyApp.Repo.Pool, otp_app: :my_app, repo: MyApp.Repo, timeout: 15000, pool_timeout: 5000, adapter: Ecto.Adapters.MySQL, username: "my_user", password: "xxxxx", database: "my_db", hostname: "my.host.tld", pool_size: 10, pool: DBConnection.Poolboy]}}, 5000)
        ** (EXIT) no process: the process is not alive or there's no process currently associated with the given name, possibly because its application isn't started

I’m not sure why it is choking. I can at least compile the app and start the server if I add :cachex to the “extra_applications” instead of to the “applications” bit. Can someone shed some light on this? Is it viable to use extra_applications instead?

Showing Posts 1 to 10

fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks OP

I solved the above by using “extra_applications” instead of “applications” (but not both), but still, I haven’t actually gotten a working example. E.g. in my context, I have something like this:

def get_cached_result!(slug) do

    Cachex.fetch(:my_cache, "key", fn(slug) ->
      Repo.get_by!(MyRecord, slug: slug, parent_id: 0)
    end)

  end

But that generates an error:

function Cachex.fetch/3 is undefined or private

gregvaughn

gregvaughn

Your primary problem is outdated information for cachex. Elixir used to require you to manage the applications key yourself but starting around 1.4 (I think) it manages it for you. When you choose to manage that key explicitly, then you need to manage it for all deps. The first thing I’d recommend is to try without cachex in any of the application keys, and just put it in deps.

fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks OP

Thanks! I got that one figured out after some trial and error, but I’m still at a loss as to how to make it actually work. I’m hoping that if I can get something working I can at least make a pull request to submit some examples or clarifications to the docs…

outlog

outlog

try with Cachex.get - not sure a fetch exists - Cachex — Cachex v4.1.1

so maybe:

def get_cached_result!(slug) do

    Cachex.get(:my_cache, "key_#{slug}", fn(slug) ->
      Repo.get_by!(MyRecord, slug: slug, parent_id: 0)
    end)

end

fwiw I have this from some old code (untested recently):

{ _status, post } = Cachex.get(:my_cache, "post_#{id}", fallback: fn(_params) ->
  Post
  |> Repo.get!(id)
  |> Repo.preload([:comments])
end)

EDIT: from a quick look: fetch is being added in Cachex 3.0 - so thats probably why you find it on the github examples:/

fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks OP

Ah, ok, I stumbled into the v3 docs without knowing it. Treacherous docs!

I’ve refactored to use the get function to something like this

  def get_cached_menu!(slug) do
    Cachex.get(:my_cache, slug, fallback: fn(slug) ->
        Repo.get_by!(MyThing, slug: slug)
    end)
  end

That compiles but it throws an exception at run-time:

** (exit) an exception was raised:
    ** (UndefinedFunctionError) function :loaded.slug/1 is undefined (module :loaded is not available)

Why is “slug” being seen as a function? Is my Ecto Repo module not in scope in the callback?

OvermindDL1

OvermindDL1

Because the return from Cachex.get(...) is not the raw value, but rather a tuple of success status. :slight_smile:

As I recall it returns either {:ok, value} for a value in the cache, or it returns {:loaded, value} for a value that was not in the cache but is not in the cache via a fallback and thus returned that, or it returns {:missing, nil} if it failed to acquire it from cache or a fallback. :slight_smile:

As you can see, it is accessing :loaded.slug, which matches the {:loaded, slug} return tuple. :slight_smile:

fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks OP

Ah, ok, that makes sense. I think I should submit a PR for the docs on that.

I ended up with something like this:

  def get_cached_thing!(slug) do
    {status, thing} = Cachex.get(:my_cache, slug, fallback: fn(slug) ->
        Repo.get_by!(Mything, slug: slug)
    end)
    case status do
      :loaded -> thing
      :error -> "That thing does not exist"
    end
  end

That works, but I’m open to any comments/improvements/suggestions. Not sure how idiomatic that solution is. Thanks!

OvermindDL1

OvermindDL1

It’s already documented at:

:slight_smile:

It works fine but not very idiomatic, I’d personally do it like (well I generally have the fallback built into the cache rather than on each call, but ignoring that part):

  def get_cached_thing!(slug) do
    Cachex.get(:my_cache, slug, fallback: fn(slug) ->
        Repo.get_by!(Mything, slug: slug)
    end)
    |> case do
      {:error, _} -> nil # It's not common to return error strings, rather you'd probably want an error tuple
      {success, value} when success in [:ok, :loaded] -> value
    end
  end

Or maybe using ok/error tuples, whichever. :slight_smile:

fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks OP

Honestly, I didn’t see that page – note that the links from GitHub - whitfin/cachex: A powerful caching library for Elixir with support for transactions, fallbacks and expirations · GitHub do not point to that page, and starting from https://hexdocs.pm/ did not lead me there in any sort of purposeful way (i.e. if you didn’t know what you were looking for already, it’s unlikely you’d end up there), so I hopefully can be forgiven for not finding it. Also, the examples there do not include code for handling the tuples. Yes, of course, if you know what you’re doing that’s a trivial omission, but for noobs, that’s one more snare that might get you. I hope I’m not just speaking for myself by wanting the example to include just a bit more context.

Thank you for the suggestions re idiomatic code! Very helpful and much appreciated!

OvermindDL1

OvermindDL1

I found that doc by going to Cachex’s dependency hex page (the first page I go to for any library):

Then I clicked the link that stated Online documentation, which took me to:

Which I then switched to night mode because Ow My Eyes… o.O
It shows two modules, they are:

  • Cachex

    • Cachex provides a straightforward interface for in-memory key/value storage
  • Cachex.Disk

    • This module contains interaction with disk for serializing terms directly to a given file path. This is mainly used for backing up a cache to disk in order to be able to export a cache to another instance. Writes can have a compression attached and will add basic compression by default

I then clicked on the top one as it’s the main interface for it, which took me to:

In the functions section I clicked the get function and it took me to the link I linked. :slight_smile:

‘Almost’ every hex library has their docs on hexdocs at a path of https://hexdocs.pm/<library_name> for note, which is linked from Hex as well (specific versions if you want too). :slight_smile:

But yep, it’s linked on the front-most hex page of the library itself. :slight_smile:

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews