BrightEyesDavid

BrightEyesDavid

A new project has a requirement that browsing content and searching while not logged in involves zero cookies. When the same pages are viewed while logged in (with the app’s session cookie present), users should be able to post comments after authorisation.

I’d like to use LiveView for some pages/sections of pages, but I’m not sure if that’s going to be possible in a secure way given the above requirement.

So far, I’ve created a simple Plug to drop the Conn session if the current_user assign is not present, which I’ll apply to public-facing routes aside from the login page. I haven’t yet added user authentication, but I believe this will do what I need for dead views: preserving the session when a user is logged in (allowing for access to the user token and CSRF protection), and dropping the session when no user is logged in (no session cookie).

defmodule MyAppWeb.Session do
  import Plug.Conn

  def remove_session_if_no_user(conn, _opts) do
    unless conn.assigns[:current_user] do
      conn
      |> clear_session()
      |> configure_session([drop: true])
    else
      conn
    end
  end
end
defmodule MyAppWeb do
  # ...

  def router do
    quote do
      #...

      import MyAppWeb.Session
    end
  end
defmodule MyAppWeb.Router do
  use MyAppWeb, :router

  pipeline :potentially_cookieless do
    plug :remove_session_if_no_user
  end

Session options are removed from the socket mount config:

defmodule MyAppWeb.Endpoint do
  # ...

  # socket "/live", Phoenix.LiveView.Socket,
  #   websocket: [connect_info: [session: @session_options]],
  #   longpoll: [connect_info: [session: @session_options]]
  socket "/live", Phoenix.LiveView.Socket

No session cookie is set in the browser, and LiveView works. :+1:

However, when I later come to providing for logged-in user commenting, if doing so via LiveView I should use the user token from the session on LiveView mount, as shown here, which would require the session options to be present in the Endpoint socket mount config.

When the session options are present in the Endpoint socket mount config, and there is no session because there is no user thanks to my plug, the LiveView dies with a debug message containing the six steps to configure the session.

Can LiveView somehow be configured to be able to both pick up on the session when it’s there and to survive when it’s not?

For example, two socket mount configurations, with/without the connect_info session options?

Some resources I’ve read:

https://byteflip.de/blog/cookieless-setup

Cookieless / Sessionless Phoenix and LiveView

Thanks.

Showing Posts 1 to 2

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

You would need to use distinct sockets for authenticated and unauthenticated usecases and update the js to connect to the correct one accordingly.

Though I‘d wonder what this „no cookie“ requirement is about given basically all legal requirements around cookies exclude session cookies from being a problem.

BrightEyesDavid

BrightEyesDavid OP

Great - many thanks. I have the basics of that working now, and am picking one of the two socket mount paths based on the presence or not of a data-attr in the HTML, which is dependent on the @current_user assign. Does that seem like a reasonable approach to you? (I think that if someone forces their browser to connect to the auth-in-progress-or-authed/session socket rather than the no-auth/no-session socket, they’d still need a valid user token at LV mounting to do anything.)

I think I just need to make sure that a full page load occurs after login so that the new JavaScript-set socket mount path is then used, which shouldn’t be a problem.

Yes, the no-cookie requirement is more of a marketing point the client is keen to be able to make rather than being due to legal requirements.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews