sodapopcan

sodapopcan

I’m having a bit of trouble wrapping my brain around how I would pass a dynamic fragment to ~p inside a macro:

defmacro __using__(opts) do
  @path opts.path

  quote do
    def handle_event("event", _, socket) do
        path = ~p"/#{@path}"

        # ...
        {:noreply, socket}
    end
  end
end

I’ve tried a fair number of functions from the Macro module both inside, namely escape and expand/expand_once which are the ones I though would do it as well as unquote (and even quote for good measure). I understand that passing an argument to the ~p macro is going to quote it and when it’s called already inside a quote block, well, uh… oh boy :face_with_spiral_eyes: As I have it does produce the correct route but of course gives a console warning. I feel like this question must have been answered before but I can’t find it and my brain hurts. At the very least I’m treating this forum as a rubber duck but any help would be much appreciated.

Showing Posts 1 to 5

0xG

0xG

There is some macro confusion here.

This changed version compiles:

defmodule A do
  defmacro __using__(opts) do
    path = opts.path
  
    quote do
      def handle_event("event", _, socket) do
          path = ~p"/#{unquote(path)}"
  
          # ...
          {:noreply, socket}
      end
    end
  end
end

But there is one more problem.
Since you are using dot syntax, I assume you’re trying to pass a map. Instead use a keyword. IIRC, keywords are not escaped:

defmodule A do
  defmacro __using__(opts) do
    path = opts[:path]
  
    quote do
      def handle_event("event", _, socket) do
          path = ~p"/#{unquote(path)}"
  
          # ...
          {:noreply, socket}
      end
    end
  end
end

defmodule B do
  use A, path: "my-path"
end
sodapopcan

sodapopcan OP

Hey hey, thanks for the response and welcome to the forum!

I’ve tried your suggestions and I’m still getting the warning. Are you seeing it? Maybe I messed up still. My problem was never that it didn’t compile—it compiled and produced the correct path, but it failed to be verified. The warning is no route path for MyAppWeb.Router matches "/#{"some-path"}" so I need to be able to pass the ~p macro and already expanded variable… which is what I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around.

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

That’s likely the clue here. The compile time validation doesn’t see ~p"/some-path", but ~p"/#{"some-path"}". Evaluate both and it’ll be the same, but their AST/the code isn’t. The latter is not using a static string, even if the dynamic input takes a static value.

You likely want this: path = sigil_p(unquote("/#{path}")) – build the static path before unquoting the result into the sigil macro call.

0xG

0xG

Hmm, I think sigil_p/2 pattern matches against ast and unquoting that expression results in fully evaluated binary.

I bet there would be a more intuitive solution but this works:

defmodule A do
  defmacro __using__(opts) do
    path = opts[:path]

    quote do
      use Phoenix.Component

      def handle_event("event", _, socket) do
        path = sigil_p(unquote({:<<>>, _meta = [], ["/#{path}"]}), [])

        # ...
        {:noreply, socket}
      end
    end
  end
end

defmodule B do
  use A, path: "my-path"
end
warning: no route path for InformedCMSWeb.Router matches "/my-path"
  iex:112: B.handle_event/3

So I passed the simplified version of desired ast:

iex> quote(do: "/#{path}")
{:<<>>, [],
 [
   "/",
   {:"::", [],
    [
      {{:., [], [Kernel, :to_string]}, [], [{:path, [], Elixir}]},
      {:binary, [], Elixir}
    ]}
 ]}
sodapopcan

sodapopcan OP

Thanks for your help, @0xG and @LostKobrakai. I’m ultimately going with a slightly more verbose but more flexible (and less brain-bendy for me) solution. I though I was only going to be dealing with URLs in the form of: ~p/resource/#{resource} but it turns out that is not the case and don’t want to get too crazy! Thanks again!

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews