sodapopcan
I’m having a bit of trouble wrapping my brain around how I would pass a dynamic fragment to ~p inside a macro:
defmacro __using__(opts) do
@path opts.path
quote do
def handle_event("event", _, socket) do
path = ~p"/#{@path}"
# ...
{:noreply, socket}
end
end
end
I’ve tried a fair number of functions from the Macro module both inside, namely escape and expand/expand_once which are the ones I though would do it as well as unquote (and even quote for good measure). I understand that passing an argument to the ~p macro is going to quote it and when it’s called already inside a quote block, well, uh… oh boy
As I have it does produce the correct route but of course gives a console warning. I feel like this question must have been answered before but I can’t find it and my brain hurts. At the very least I’m treating this forum as a rubber duck but any help would be much appreciated.
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 5- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
0xG
There is some macro confusion here.
This changed version compiles:
But there is one more problem.
Since you are using dot syntax, I assume you’re trying to pass a map. Instead use a keyword. IIRC, keywords are not escaped:
sodapopcan
Hey hey, thanks for the response and welcome to the forum!
I’ve tried your suggestions and I’m still getting the warning. Are you seeing it? Maybe I messed up still. My problem was never that it didn’t compile—it compiled and produced the correct path, but it failed to be verified. The warning is
no route path for MyAppWeb.Router matches "/#{"some-path"}"so I need to be able to pass the~pmacro and already expanded variable… which is what I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around.LostKobrakai
That’s likely the clue here. The compile time validation doesn’t see
~p"/some-path", but~p"/#{"some-path"}". Evaluate both and it’ll be the same, but their AST/the code isn’t. The latter is not using a static string, even if the dynamic input takes a static value.You likely want this:
path = sigil_p(unquote("/#{path}"))– build the static path before unquoting the result into the sigil macro call.0xG
Hmm, I think
sigil_p/2pattern matches against ast and unquoting that expression results in fully evaluated binary.I bet there would be a more intuitive solution but this works:
So I passed the simplified version of desired ast:
sodapopcan
Thanks for your help, @0xG and @LostKobrakai. I’m ultimately going with a slightly more verbose but more flexible (and less brain-bendy for me) solution. I though I was only going to be dealing with URLs in the form of:
~p/resource/#{resource}but it turns out that is not the case and don’t want to get too crazy! Thanks again!