sodapopcan

sodapopcan

I’m having a bit of trouble wrapping my brain around how I would pass a dynamic fragment to ~p inside a macro:

defmacro __using__(opts) do
  @path opts.path

  quote do
    def handle_event("event", _, socket) do
        path = ~p"/#{@path}"

        # ...
        {:noreply, socket}
    end
  end
end

I’ve tried a fair number of functions from the Macro module both inside, namely escape and expand/expand_once which are the ones I though would do it as well as unquote (and even quote for good measure). I understand that passing an argument to the ~p macro is going to quote it and when it’s called already inside a quote block, well, uh… oh boy :face_with_spiral_eyes: As I have it does produce the correct route but of course gives a console warning. I feel like this question must have been answered before but I can’t find it and my brain hurts. At the very least I’m treating this forum as a rubber duck but any help would be much appreciated.

First 5 of 5 Posts Switch mode

0xG

0xG

There is some macro confusion here.

This changed version compiles:

defmodule A do
  defmacro __using__(opts) do
    path = opts.path
  
    quote do
      def handle_event("event", _, socket) do
          path = ~p"/#{unquote(path)}"
  
          # ...
          {:noreply, socket}
      end
    end
  end
end

But there is one more problem.
Since you are using dot syntax, I assume you’re trying to pass a map. Instead use a keyword. IIRC, keywords are not escaped:

defmodule A do
  defmacro __using__(opts) do
    path = opts[:path]
  
    quote do
      def handle_event("event", _, socket) do
          path = ~p"/#{unquote(path)}"
  
          # ...
          {:noreply, socket}
      end
    end
  end
end

defmodule B do
  use A, path: "my-path"
end
sodapopcan

sodapopcan OP

Hey hey, thanks for the response and welcome to the forum!

I’ve tried your suggestions and I’m still getting the warning. Are you seeing it? Maybe I messed up still. My problem was never that it didn’t compile—it compiled and produced the correct path, but it failed to be verified. The warning is no route path for MyAppWeb.Router matches "/#{"some-path"}" so I need to be able to pass the ~p macro and already expanded variable… which is what I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around.

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

That’s likely the clue here. The compile time validation doesn’t see ~p"/some-path", but ~p"/#{"some-path"}". Evaluate both and it’ll be the same, but their AST/the code isn’t. The latter is not using a static string, even if the dynamic input takes a static value.

You likely want this: path = sigil_p(unquote("/#{path}")) – build the static path before unquoting the result into the sigil macro call.

0xG

0xG

Hmm, I think sigil_p/2 pattern matches against ast and unquoting that expression results in fully evaluated binary.

I bet there would be a more intuitive solution but this works:

defmodule A do
  defmacro __using__(opts) do
    path = opts[:path]

    quote do
      use Phoenix.Component

      def handle_event("event", _, socket) do
        path = sigil_p(unquote({:<<>>, _meta = [], ["/#{path}"]}), [])

        # ...
        {:noreply, socket}
      end
    end
  end
end

defmodule B do
  use A, path: "my-path"
end
warning: no route path for InformedCMSWeb.Router matches "/my-path"
  iex:112: B.handle_event/3

So I passed the simplified version of desired ast:

iex> quote(do: "/#{path}")
{:<<>>, [],
 [
   "/",
   {:"::", [],
    [
      {{:., [], [Kernel, :to_string]}, [], [{:path, [], Elixir}]},
      {:binary, [], Elixir}
    ]}
 ]}
sodapopcan

sodapopcan OP

Thanks for your help, @0xG and @LostKobrakai. I’m ultimately going with a slightly more verbose but more flexible (and less brain-bendy for me) solution. I though I was only going to be dealing with URLs in the form of: ~p/resource/#{resource} but it turns out that is not the case and don’t want to get too crazy! Thanks again!

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
jonnycharles
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
spammy
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
dli
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app? Looking for hints regarding: Addi...
New
roeland
Kia ora, We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
bottlenecked
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps. Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
rahultumpala
Hello, I have an Elixir backend that implements a custom protocol over TCP. I want to load test the backend and assess the performance o...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge &amp; Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
ausimian
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement