martinthenth

martinthenth

UUIDv7 - A UUID v7 implementation and Ecto.Type for Elixir - based on Rust

Hello everybody :wave:

Recently, some of my colleagues talked about database ids and uuids and their problems, and I remembered the pain of working with randomly distributed primary keys. They’re nice at first but then you have to index and order by a different field like created_at, while serial and bigserial already have an order and are indexed as the primary key.

UUIDv6, UUIDv7 and UUIDv8 are new standards to deal with issues found in UUIDv4 and earlier. I especially liked this post that analyzes the new standards: https://blog.devgenius.io/analyzing-new-unique-identifier-formats-uuidv6-uuidv7-and-uuidv8-d6cc5cd7391a

My favourite is UUIDv7 because they’re like UUIDv4 but the first characters are based on a millisecond timestamp; it seems like a very small change.

Elixir doesn’t have a common implementation of UUIDv7 yet, and Ecto is based on UUIDv4. So I decided to build one based on a Rust package crates.io: Rust Package Registry, which is relatively mature.

The new library is called UUIDv7 and is available on Hex UUIDv7 - Hex.

Because it’s based on Rust, the UUID generation is a whopping 72% faster than the default Ecto.UUID version 4 generator. NIFs are precompiled and generated for most platforms.

It’s easy to set up, you only have to change one line:

def App.Schemas.User do
  use Ecto.Schema
  @primary_key {:id, UUIDv7, autogenerate: true}
end

You can verify the UUIDs are ordered by running a small test:

uuid1 = UUIDv7.generate()
uuid2 = UUIDv7.generate()
uuid3 = UUIDv7.generate()
uuid4 = UUIDv7.generate()

assert uuid1 < uuid2
assert uuid2 < uuid3
assert uuid3 < uuid4

Though you may have to add Process.sleep(1) between the generations to skip one millisecond (UUIDv7 is based on milliseconds and ends with random bits)

Since the performance difference between Rust-based UUID generation and Ecto.UUID is so large, maybe it could be a motivation to write other more commonly used functions as NIFs from more compute-efficient languages?

You can check the benchmark here: UUIDv7 - Benchmark

GitHub: UUIDv7 - GitHub
Hex: UUIDv7 - Hex

Most Liked

martinthenth

martinthenth

Yup, UUIDv7 and Uniq are compatible because of the shared standard, but uniq is a bit slower because it’s 100% Elixir. It’s comparable with Ecto.UUID.

iex(1)> UUIDv7.generate()
"0188f846-191e-7f32-81f1-871f64b71d6b"
iex(2)> Uniq.UUID.uuid7()
"0188f846-1ae4-7205-8cf4-ac0be8a620a1"

Benchmark:

Name                     ips        average  deviation         median         99th %
uuidv7                1.75 M      570.22 ns  ±3940.19%         500 ns         667 ns
uniq (uuid v7)        1.07 M      937.20 ns  ±1852.78%         916 ns        1000 ns
ecto (uuid v4)        1.02 M      978.17 ns  ±1593.54%         958 ns        1042 ns

Comparison:
uuidv7                1.75 M
uniq (uuid v7)        1.07 M - 1.64x slower +366.98 ns
ecto (uuid v4)        1.02 M - 1.72x slower +407.95 ns
c4710n

c4710n

A quote from https://uuid7.com/

  • Concurrency and Distribution: In distributed systems, generating unique, sequential IDs can be a challenge. UUIDv7 can be generated concurrently across multiple nodes without the risk of collisions, making it suitable for distributed architectures.
sbuttgereit

sbuttgereit

New proposed standards. While it looks like UUID v6+ have made a lot of progress, they haven’t been adopted as standards yet: RFC 9562 - Universally Unique IDentifiers (UUIDs)

This isn’t to say that what ends up being adopted will be much different than has appeared in the various drafts, but for some the formality can matter.

As an aside, it looks like the scope of the proposed standard has expanded as they’ve progressed through the process to actually revising the UUID v1 through v5 standards as well: Revise Universally Unique Identifier Definitions (uuidrev)… the revisions to previous standards are very limited to doing things like correcting errata (unsurprisingly).

Where Next?

Popular in Announcing Top

sorentwo
Hello! tl;dr Announcing Oban, an Ecto based job processing library with a focus on reliability and historical observability. After spen...
985 43487 311
New
jakub-zawislak
Hi everyone, I’m coming from the Symfony (PHP) framework. I like Phoenix, but it has a one thing that was build much better in the Symfo...
New
josevalim
Yes, yet another parser combinator library! Most of the parser combinators in the ecosystem are either compile-time, often using AST tra...
159 19417 141
New
zorbash
I created Kitto a framework for dashboards inspired by Dashing. The distributed characteristics of Elixir and the low memory footprint...
New
type1fool
WebAuthnLiveComponent WebAuthnComponents See this post about renaming the package. Passwordless authentication for Phoenix LiveView app...
New
Crowdhailer
Experimenting with this code. OK.try do user &lt;- fetch_user(1) cart &lt;- fetch_cart(1) order = checkout(cart, user) save_orde...
New
Qqwy
Hello everyone, I wrote a small library today called MapDiff. It returns a map listing the (smallest amount of) changes to get from map...
New
aditya7iyengar
Rummage.Ecto and Rummage.Phoenix provide ways to perform Searching, Sorting and Pagination over Ecto queries and Phoenix collections. Fo...
New
michalmuskala
Hello everybody. I have just released Jason - a new JSON library. You might be wondering, why do we need a new library? The primary foc...
New
marcuslankenau
I feel kind of stuck with the absence of a proper xml library for Elixir. Currently I use SweetXML which was ok for me more or less to pa...
New

Other popular topics Top

9mm
I am constructing a JSON object (map) and I need to conditionally set a field. I’m trying to write proper elixir-way code… and I’m at a l...
New
AstonJ
Posting this to see if we can make things easier for people to get into Neovim. If you use Neovim and have a favourite distro please let ...
New
Nvim
Anybody knows a comprehensive comparison of Django and Phoenix, thanks for the help. Where are they similar? Where do they differ the m...
New
jay1
Why is it that the mnesia database isn’t the most preferred database for use in Elixir/Phoenix?
New
vrod
I am using the Starship cross-shell prompt – it seems pretty nice, but I get some errors: [WARN] - (starship::utils): Executing command ...
New
romenigld
I am trying to run a deploy with docker and I successfully runned with this command: docker build -t romenigld/blog-prod . but when I t...
New
nsuchy
Hi. I’ve noticed that Windows Powershell has it’s own IEX command and you cannot access Elixir’s IEX due to the conflict. This isn’t a cr...
New
hariharasudhan94
Lets say I have map like this fetching from my database %{"_id" =&gt; #BSON.ObjectId&lt;58eb1a7a9ad169198c3dXXXX&gt;, "email" =&gt; ...
New
svb
Hi! Currently I want to submit a form by pressing the Enter key. However, since my input field is of type “textarea” this is just adds a...
New
vonH
In asking this question I am more interested about the expressiveness of the language itself and less concerned about the availability of...
New

Latest on Elixir Forum

Elixir Forum

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement