mmyers

mmyers

I’m exploring different ways of interfacing with C code, and in testing C-Nodes, my ExUnit tests were failing randomly. I start the C-Node process using Port.open. And I found that if I call Process.sleep(50) after opening the Port, then all the tests succeed.

Is this a good way to do it?
Is there a better way to wait for the C-Node to be ready to accept a connection?

Showing Posts 1 to 7

ityonemo

ityonemo

Use net_kernel.monitor_nodes/2, then launch, the wait to have a nodeup message delivered to your test and block on a receive; then continue with your tests.

mmyers

mmyers OP

I’m not sure :net_kernel.monitor_nodes will give me what I’m looking for. I want to know when it is safe to connect to the C-Node. And according to the Erlang docs:

A nodeup message is delivered to all subscribing processes when a new node is connected

Maybe just a retry with a timeout or limit on the number of retries will work.

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

How would the C node be connected, but not ready to be connected to?

mmyers

mmyers OP

How would the C node be connected, but not ready to be connected to?

Exactly. The C-Node is not connected initially, which is why net_kernel.monitor_nodes won’t work.
There is a delay between starting the C-Node process, and the C-Node having an open socket, ready to receive a connection from an Elixir/Erlang node. That delay is what I want to account for with something better than a fixed sleep time.

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

Which is what the messaging solution provides. You :net_kernel.monitor_nodes, and then receive do with a pattern to wait for the nodeup message.

mmyers

mmyers OP

Thanks for your feedback. I have a solution.

The problem I was seeing in my tests occurred when trying to send a message before the C node was listening.

    Elixir                        C node        
-------------      ------------------------------------
  Port.open()  --->   OS process starts running C node
                                    |
  Send message ---> (X) not ready, Epmd connection fails
                                    |
                     (ei_listen, ei_publish, ei_accept)
  Send message --->    Epmd connection to C node (OK)

Comments from @benwilson512 and @ityonemo made me think, “What if the C node initiated the connection back to the Elixir node, instead of the other way around?” And maybe that’s how they were thinking it worked (or should have worked) in the first place. The initial code was just from sample C node code found on online, where the C node published itself to Epmd and listened, waiting for Elixir nodes to connect, as diagrammed above.

So I changed the C node to initiate the node connection, rather than just waiting for a connection:

    Elixir                     C node
--------------      --------------------------------
Port.open()    ---> OS process starts running C node
                                 |
connected (OK) <---        ei_connect()

And after I remembered that C nodes are hidden, and used :net_kernel.monitor_nodes(true, node_type: :hidden), then I did get a :nodeup message!

This also simplified the code on the C node side, I can just call ei_connect, and don’t have to use ei_listen, ei_publish and ei_accept.

ityonemo

ityonemo

shoot! I should have been more specific and reminded you that C nodes are hidden.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New
ausimian
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews