Mukulch15
I read about process dictionaries and how they introduce side effects but how are states different from process dictionaries ? Shouldn’t process states introduce the same issues that process dictionaries have ?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 7- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
LostKobrakai
The process state is explicitly maintained by whatever code runs in a process. The process dictionary can be written to and later retrieved without the code running in the process passing it on.
hauleth
Process state is the value passed to you in the function argument, process dictionary is black magic that you probably should never touch on your own unlike you will really know what the hell is happening.
ityonemo
Don’t say “never”, it’s more like you should wait until you’re a senior dev that has seen how it’s used under the hood in elixir and understand fully why that choice is made where it is
and understand why your code is not that.
hauleth
In my post
s/unlike/untiland it will make more sense. Unfortunately I cannot edit myself nowMukulch15
But Agent actually allows us to use the state as a mutable variable right ? It can also be written and retrieved later.
LostKobrakai
Yes both maintain state. The difference is in how the state is maintained. For process state the state data is explicitly passed as parameter in the function the process runs - most often called the process loop. This is essentially tail call based recursion and therefore functional at its core.
The process dictionary however doesn’t use recursion, but side effects to store data. I’m not even sure if the dictionary is also on the process heap like normal process state. In the end it’s something quite different than process state from an implementation perspective.
I’ll try to illustrate this with some code:
This is kinda how a process loop works. State is continuouesly aggregated by a reducing function handling the last state and a received message from the outside. State is maintained by passing it as parameter to the next reduction. It’s never really stored somewhere, but part of the callstack. Most of the time you never see this part in your codebase though, because it’s handled by the various
:genbehaviours we’re all using. E.g. in the above case a user would just need to providehandle_message, while the rest of the code wouldn’t need to change.The process dictionary on the other hand is a “database”. It’s a key-value table you can put kv pairs in and then it’s just there, no matter what code runs on the process. Kinda like a process specific ets table.
Mukulch15
Thanks a lot for the answers everyone.