jaysoifer
Sheer curiosity.
I’ve asked this question on StackOverflow and I got some answers assuming that this operator is the same one that is used in Java, thus it is probably called the same.
I know. Who cares?
I do.
Is there a proper way to mention the <> (binary concat) operator specific to Elixir? Should I call it the “diamond” operator?
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app?
Looking for hints regarding:
Addi...
New
Kia ora,
We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps.
Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
Hello,
I have an Elixir backend that implements a custom protocol over TCP. I want to load test the backend and assess the performance o...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #ai
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 9- Show Best Posts
- Show All Posts (oldest first)
- Show All Posts (newest first)
peerreynders
elixir-lang.org: Binaries (and bitstrings)
elixir-lang.org: Binaries, strings and char lists:
Elixir In Action p.46
michalmuskala
What’s wrong with “binary concatenation” operator? It makes it explicit and leaves no room for confusion.
jaysoifer
Sounds good to me
dardub
Can I call it the mini spaceship operator?
jaysoifer
As far as I know… the community has the upper hand
pesnk
+1 for the spaceship operator.
Maybe the spaceship that concatenates strings
peerreynders
Playfulness aside, “spaceship operator” has already been taken in general by three-way comparison - overloading terms like this rarely enhances clarity (and needlessly further contaminates search engine results).
[If web site content is search engine optimized then maybe technical documentation should be too.]
pesnk
True. I like the
binary concatenationoperator, once it is used basically for that.Onor.io
What’s wrong with binary concatenation operator?