water
This code let’s me connect with a 2d camera.
I’m running Linux and I can read the messages from the TCP server on the camera.
But it never triggers :tcp_closed or :tcp_error which I’d expect to happen after unplugging the Ethernet cable (rj45).
When I do unplug the cable, the message stop coming in. After reconnecting the cable the messages come in again, without even mentioning the connection was temporarily severed.
defmodule TcpClient do
use GenServer
require Logger
@con_opts [:binary, active: true, packet: :raw, send_timeout: 10000]
@connect_timeout 2000
@retry_interval 1000
defmodule State do
defstruct host: "localhost",
port: 1234
end
def start_link(opts) do
GenServer.start_link(__MODULE__, opts)
end
def init(opts) do
state = opts_to_initial_state(opts)
send(self(), :connect)
{:ok, state}
end
def handle_info(:connect, state) do
Logger.info("Connecting to #{state.host}:#{state.port}")
case :gen_tcp.connect(state.host, state.port, @con_opts, @connect_timeout) do
{:ok, _socket} ->
Logger.info("Connected successfully to #{state.host}:#{state.port}")
{:noreply, state}
{:error, reason} ->
Logger.warning(
"Connection to #{state.host}:#{state.port} failed: #{inspect(reason)}. Will retry in #{@retry_interval}ms"
)
{:noreply, state, @retry_interval}
end
end
def handle_info(:timeout, state) do
send(self(), :connect)
{:noreply, state}
end
def handle_info({:tcp_closed, _socket}, state) do
Logger.info("Connection to #{state.host}:#{state.port} closed. Reconnecting...")
send(self(), :connect)
{:noreply, state}
end
def handle_info({:tcp_error, _socket, reason}, state) do
Logger.info("Connection to #{state.host}:#{state.port} error: #{inspect(reason)}")
send(self(), :connect)
{:noreply, state}
end
def handle_info({:tcp, _socket, data}, state) do
string =
Regex.scan(~r/star;(\S+);stop/, data <> data, capture: :all_but_first)
|> List.first()
|> List.first()
Logger.info("String: #{string}")
{:noreply, state}
end
defp opts_to_initial_state(opts) do
host = Keyword.get(opts, :host, "localhost") |> String.to_charlist()
port = Keyword.fetch!(opts, :port)
%State{host: host, port: port}
end
end
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 5- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
lud
I believe this is inherent to how tcp works. Connections are not something physical nor permanent, its just an agreement to send and receive messages.
I guess if you want to detect unplugs you would have to send ping messages every N seconds to detect failure to send/receive.
al2o3cr
+1 @lud - the TCP connection only cares about if packets are moving through.
You’ll only get a
:tcp_closedwhen either end explicitly says “close this connection”.If the other end goes away without saying goodbye, you’ll get a
:tcp_errorwhen you try to send a packet (after waitingsend_timeout)krasenyp
To elaborate a little further - TCP is at the transport layer of the network stack, while disconnecting the cable is a physical layer concern. There are two levels between them - the data link layer and the network layer.
jhogberg
To elaborate even further, it’s mathematically impossible to detect this in the general case, you cannot design a protocol that will do it reliably. The closest you can get is to send ping messages as @lud suggested, which has its own issues but is good enough for most real-world uses.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Generals’_Problem
water
Thanks for all feedback.
I tried a few thing and I think I found an approach, feedback appreciated.
It’s always
:okdef handle_info({:tcp, _socket, "0003L000000007\r\n0003?\r\n"}, state) doEven after unplugging, I only see successful sends.
Of course it’s not giving a response.
I thought this would trigger an error somewhere, but it doesn’t.
I guess I’ll keep a
state.counterand +1 after send, then -1 it after receive.Check if this counter is to big to trigger a
:detected_a_disconnect