water
This code let’s me connect with a 2d camera.
I’m running Linux and I can read the messages from the TCP server on the camera.
But it never triggers :tcp_closed or :tcp_error which I’d expect to happen after unplugging the Ethernet cable (rj45).
When I do unplug the cable, the message stop coming in. After reconnecting the cable the messages come in again, without even mentioning the connection was temporarily severed.
defmodule TcpClient do
use GenServer
require Logger
@con_opts [:binary, active: true, packet: :raw, send_timeout: 10000]
@connect_timeout 2000
@retry_interval 1000
defmodule State do
defstruct host: "localhost",
port: 1234
end
def start_link(opts) do
GenServer.start_link(__MODULE__, opts)
end
def init(opts) do
state = opts_to_initial_state(opts)
send(self(), :connect)
{:ok, state}
end
def handle_info(:connect, state) do
Logger.info("Connecting to #{state.host}:#{state.port}")
case :gen_tcp.connect(state.host, state.port, @con_opts, @connect_timeout) do
{:ok, _socket} ->
Logger.info("Connected successfully to #{state.host}:#{state.port}")
{:noreply, state}
{:error, reason} ->
Logger.warning(
"Connection to #{state.host}:#{state.port} failed: #{inspect(reason)}. Will retry in #{@retry_interval}ms"
)
{:noreply, state, @retry_interval}
end
end
def handle_info(:timeout, state) do
send(self(), :connect)
{:noreply, state}
end
def handle_info({:tcp_closed, _socket}, state) do
Logger.info("Connection to #{state.host}:#{state.port} closed. Reconnecting...")
send(self(), :connect)
{:noreply, state}
end
def handle_info({:tcp_error, _socket, reason}, state) do
Logger.info("Connection to #{state.host}:#{state.port} error: #{inspect(reason)}")
send(self(), :connect)
{:noreply, state}
end
def handle_info({:tcp, _socket, data}, state) do
string =
Regex.scan(~r/star;(\S+);stop/, data <> data, capture: :all_but_first)
|> List.first()
|> List.first()
Logger.info("String: #{string}")
{:noreply, state}
end
defp opts_to_initial_state(opts) do
host = Keyword.get(opts, :host, "localhost") |> String.to_charlist()
port = Keyword.fetch!(opts, :port)
%State{host: host, port: port}
end
end
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 5- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
lud
I believe this is inherent to how tcp works. Connections are not something physical nor permanent, its just an agreement to send and receive messages.
I guess if you want to detect unplugs you would have to send ping messages every N seconds to detect failure to send/receive.
al2o3cr
+1 @lud - the TCP connection only cares about if packets are moving through.
You’ll only get a
:tcp_closedwhen either end explicitly says “close this connection”.If the other end goes away without saying goodbye, you’ll get a
:tcp_errorwhen you try to send a packet (after waitingsend_timeout)krasenyp
To elaborate a little further - TCP is at the transport layer of the network stack, while disconnecting the cable is a physical layer concern. There are two levels between them - the data link layer and the network layer.
jhogberg
To elaborate even further, it’s mathematically impossible to detect this in the general case, you cannot design a protocol that will do it reliably. The closest you can get is to send ping messages as @lud suggested, which has its own issues but is good enough for most real-world uses.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Generals’_Problem
water
Thanks for all feedback.
I tried a few thing and I think I found an approach, feedback appreciated.
It’s always
:okdef handle_info({:tcp, _socket, "0003L000000007\r\n0003?\r\n"}, state) doEven after unplugging, I only see successful sends.
Of course it’s not giving a response.
I thought this would trigger an error somewhere, but it doesn’t.
I guess I’ll keep a
state.counterand +1 after send, then -1 it after receive.Check if this counter is to big to trigger a
:detected_a_disconnect