lud

lud

Hello,

By default Phoenix will generate this on a new project:

# def render("500.json", _assigns) do
#   %{errors: %{detail: "Internal Server Error"}}
# end

def render(template, _assigns) do
  %{errors: %{detail: Phoenix.Controller.status_message_from_template(template)}}
end

Not sure if it is because of an english thing (not my native language) but to me it seems that a map would describe a single error ; plus we are giving the detail for one error.

When I’ll have multiple errors, on an Ecto changeset for instance, I’ll generally return something like that:

%{
  error: %{
    message: "Invalid Request",
    detail: %{
      errors: [] # ... changeset errors as a list
    }
  }
}

Or maybe something like this:

%{
  errors: [
    %{
      message: "Invalid Request",
      detail: [] # ... changeset errors as a list
    }
  ]
}

But I don’t understand the default layout, which is one of the first things I change on a new project.

What is the rationale behind this?

Thank you.

Showing Posts 1 to 8

lud

lud OP

@chrismccord Maybe you can shed some light on this!

jdiago

jdiago

You sort of answered your own question.

Code gen is only there to get someone started. It’ll never be 100% correct for all use cases and it’s almost never the code that ends up in production. It’s not a crime to change the code generators give you.

As a last resort, you can also make your proposed changes to the generator and open a PR to see if it’ll get accepted.

lud

lud OP

Hello,

Well I’m asking what is the rationale beyond those choices. Of course I can change it.

Code gen is only there to get someone started. It’ll never be 100% correct for all use cases

My problem here is that is has been correct for 0% use cases in my experience. We always changed it. I wonder why the current layout was chosen.

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

I’d propose a PR changing it to something more useful then. To me this doesn’t look like a very intentional format.

jdiago

jdiago

I dug a little deeper and this is my speculation:

This bit is in the MyApp.ErrorJSON module.

When you use mix phx.gen.json, you will get a resource_json.ex which will have the following:

  def error(%{changeset: changeset}) do
    errors = Ecto.Changeset.traverse_errors(changeset, fn {msg, _opts} -> msg end)

    %{errors: errors}
  end

Seems to me like lud’s suggested change is supposed to go into a controller’s JSON module.

Notice the matching :errors root key. That probably makes it easier for API clients to handle errors no matter where it’s coming from (an action on a resource or somewhere up the plug chain)

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

Ecto.Changeset.traverse_errors/2 returns a list though. Not a single object.

jdiago

jdiago

errors: [...] makes it grammatically correct.

If an error comes from somewhere up the plug chain, MyApp.ErrorJSON is used which will return {errors: ...}. If the error is on a create or update action, the resource’s JSON module will also return {errors: ...}.

That would mean that I, as the API consummer, would only have to worry about handling 1 errors root key instead of handling both error and errors.

lud

lud OP

But you would not know if its a list or an object. Hence the second “correct” example I gave where errors is always a list.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Discussions Top

wmnnd
Hey folks, I wanted to share with you a project I’ve been working on for a while: It’s an Open Source (AGPLv3) newsletter tool. Think Ma...
New
axelson
Hi there! :wave: @frigidcode and I (but mostly him) have been running an Elixir Book club, we’re almost done with Designing Elixir Syste...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New
alexslade
Fly’s CEO posted this recently - Turn And Face The Strange · The Fly Blog It says that Fly is going all-in on sprites, which is a worry ...
New
sntran
In my third year of college, around 2010, I found Erlang. A few years later, I found Elixir. I liked the ideas at once: many small proces...
New
Ganna
Hi everyone, I have 8 years of production experience with Erlang/OTP and I’m just starting to get to know Elixir. What would you learn f...
New
johnkirkham
A note on form. Joe Armstrong, co-creator of the Erlang programming language, died in April 2019. What follows is a work of narrative non...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews