astery
Here is the list and it is at the bottom of the table.
I would expect that <- would have a right associativity like =. Because in both operators when we match statements:
{:ok, _} = Some.function()
and
with {:ok, _} <- Some.function() do
# ...
end
Pattern is on the left side and one evaluated is on the right. So I’ve expected Right associativity.
What’s wrong with my reasoning?
Trending in Questions
Hey guys,
I’ve got a huge CSV ( around 10 GB ) that needs to be processed hourly
Do you guys have any suggestions what is the best prac...
New
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #ai
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
IvanIvanoff
Associativity plays a role when multiple operators are chained. It controls the order of grouping operands to operators with the same precedence.
=being with Right associativity means thata = b = 10will be evaluated as(a = (b = 10))and not as((a = b) = 10).-is also left associative, meaning that5 - 4 - 3is evaluated as((5 - 4) - 3) == -2. If it was right associative it would have been evaluated as(5 - (4 - 3)) == 4.When the operator is used a single time, the associativity does not play a role –
5 - 3 == 2no matter if-is left or right associative<-is left associative not only in the docs, but also in the parser. So there is no error in the documentation.I was not able to actually come up with an example where multiple
<-are chained, something like this does not work:If I had to guess before looking it up, I would have guessed that
<-is non-associative. Example for non associative operator is the unarynot. A singlenot trueis valid, but chaining multiplenots is not:not true not falseis a syntax error.cevado
i belive that
<-is left associative due to how it works when you use several of them in sequence, likesince I can use the result of the first
<-in the next<-statement. At least is how I understand it.IvanIvanoff
In these examples of
withandforthe comma,separates the expressions. The comma itself is left associative, which is what controls the order of evaluation.You can check that by replacing the left associative
<-with the right associative=and still being able to use the result of the previous results: