chensan

chensan

I’m writing tests for my controller:

  defp log_in_user(%{conn: conn, log_in_as: email}) do
    role = role_fixture()
    user = user_fixture(role, email: email)
    conn = assign(conn, :current_user, user)
    {:ok, conn: conn, user: user}
  end

  defp create_site(%{conn: conn, user: user}) do
    site = site_fixture(user)
    {:ok, site: site}
  end

  describe "delete site" do
    setup [:log_in_user, :create_site]

    @tag log_in_as: "sam"
    test "deletes chosen site", %{conn: conn, site: site} do
      conn = delete(conn, Routes.site_path(conn, :delete, site))
      assert redirected_to(conn) == Routes.site_path(conn, :index)

      assert_error_sent 404, fn ->
        get(conn, Routes.site_path(conn, :show, site))
      end
    end
  end

The weird thing here is conn.assigns.current_user becomes nil in assert_error_sent where it should have value.

I found some similar questions around the web:

  1. Troubleshooting a failed test 302 redirect instead of 200 - #3 by chensan
  2. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50110449/phoenix-controller-test-case-loses-current-user
  3. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46363292/losing-conn-assigns-in-the-middle-of-a-test

Seems the problem is caused by Phoenix.ConnTest – Phoenix v1.4.0, and there’s a fix:

      saved_assigns = conn.assigns

      conn =
        conn
        |> recycle()
        |> Map.put(:assigns, saved_assigns)

I don’t quite understand why, it’s so unexpected in our tests. Anyone could help explain it?

Showing Posts 1 to 8

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

recycle does essentially what happens if you start a new request in the browser. Any new request in the browser will start of without any assigns. Usually you’re kept logged in by putting something in the session for the user.

chensan

chensan OP

When I logged in a website, I would expect myself logged-in all the time until I log out. But Phoenix recycling breaks this expectation.

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

That’s just not true. If you’re not using session based authentication you’d need to log in new for each request. The only data which survives between requests is the stuff you put into the session. Anything else is discarded at the end of a request. That’s true for the request you do with a browser in dev mode and exactly what recycle mimics for tests.

chensan

chensan OP

Ok, so how can I make the tests better? Writing conn = conn |> cycle() |> Map.put(:assigns, conn.assigns) everywhere in my controller tests is so ugly.

idi527

idi527

Maybe Plug.Test — Plug v1.20.2

setup %{conn: conn} do
  {:ok, conn: Plug.Test.init_test_session(conn, user_id: 666)}
end

I wouldn’t change assigns manually, instead I’d pipe the requests through the actual plug pipelines with the session set via Plug.Test.init_test_session/2 to get the expected conn with all relevant assigns set.

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

Either what @idi527 said: Use the session and your real plugs / pipelines.
Or simply not reuse the conn for places where you’re e.g. testing a single plug.

result = MyPlug.call(conn, opts)
assert …

result = MyPlug.call(conn, opts_2)
assert …
chensan

chensan OP

Can we say the tip presented in Programming Phoenix book for easier testing is defective :slight_smile:

  def call(conn, _opts) do
    user_id = get_session(conn, :user_id)

    cond do
      conn.assigns[:current_user] ->
        conn

      user = user_id && Accounts.get_user(user_id) ->
        assign(conn, :current_user, user)

      true ->
        assign(conn, :current_user, nil)
    end
  end

In the beginning I just logged in user with naive post(conn, Routes.session_path(conn, :create), ...):

    @tag log_in_as: "sam"
    test "deletes chosen site", %{conn: conn, site: site, user: user} do
      conn =
        post(conn, Routes.session_path(conn, :create),
          session: %{email: user.email, password: "123456"}
        )

      conn = delete(conn, Routes.site_path(conn, :delete, site))
      assert redirected_to(conn) == Routes.site_path(conn, :index)

      # conn =
      #   conn
      #   |> recycle()
      #   |> Map.put(:assigns, conn.assigns)

      assert_error_sent 404, fn ->
        get(conn, Routes.site_path(conn, :show, site))
      end
    end

No need to call recycle() in this code.

chensan

chensan OP

After reading the source code, I’d like to share what I learned so far.

When we run get(conn, Routes.site_path(conn, :show, site)), a new conn was created, and cookies and some request headers (~w(accept authorization)) from old conn are copied to new conn - that’s what Phoenix recycling does for us, it emulates the behavior of browser. But conn.assigns is not copied, results in a nil value of current_user.

The reason post(conn, Routes.session_path(conn, :create), session: %{email: user.email, password: "123456"} ) works is because Auth module selects another path:

  def call(conn, _opts) do
    user_id = get_session(conn, :user_id)

    cond do
      conn.assigns[:current_user] -> # <- the way programming phoenix book suggests
        conn

      user = user_id && Accounts.get_user(user_id) -> # <- post Routes.session_path just selects this way.
        assign(conn, :current_user, user)

      true ->
        assign(conn, :current_user, nil)
    end
  end

Thanks all for your kind help :slight_smile:

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Stef-Verniers
Hello I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews