Hello,
I was wondering, why Phoenix doesn’t follow the “unwritten rule” that your module path should be identical to the file path in the system (ex: MyApp.Bla.Ble
would be in lib/my_app/bla/ble.ex
) for some of its framework files?
That may sound dumb, but one of the things that I like most about Elixir is the well-defined patterns that everyone uses, variables, atoms and files should use underscore, modules should be camel case, etc. This, IMO, makes the code well organized, easy to read, and easy to find. And in my experience, most of the Elixir libraries follow these patterns (except Google ones, ofc).
At the same time, you have some parts of the Phoenix Framework which seem to ignore this. For example, instead of having MyAppWeb.Controllers.Page
which would be stored in lib/my_app_web/controllers/page.ex
, we have MyAppWeb.PageController
which is stored in lib/my_app_web/controllers/page_controller.ex
. The same thing happens with views, components, etc.
I know I’m exaggerating, but this for some reason makes me remember java class names like AbstractSingletonProxyFactoryBean
I’m not saying that this is wrong or anything, it mostly depends on the user’s opinion in the end… But at the same time, having the module reflect the file path makes things easy to find and makes, IMO, the language not dependent on IDEs, so this made me wonder why Phoenix does this, I’m pretty sure there is a good reason.