nazevedo3

nazevedo3

Hi All,

I could use some help working with nested structures. I have this map:

%{
  tasks: [
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 1, name: "walk the dog"},
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 2, name: "cook dinner"},
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 3, name: "laundry"}
  ]
}

I want to pass that map into function, along with an integer. If there’s a task with the same ID then the number that gets passed in, I want to update that map so that the “completed” field is changed to true and everything else is left unchanged.

Here’s what I have so far where I can update the map, but I’m not sure how to attach it back to the original list of maps.

 def complete_item(list, item_id)  do
  for items_in_list <- list[:tasks], Map.get(items_in_list, :id) == item_id, do: Map.put(items_in_list, :completed, true)
  end

Showing Posts 1 to 4

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

Hello and welcome,

There are many ways to update/put a key in a map, Map.update, Map.put, Map.new/2, but in that particular case where You want to update an existing atom key in a map, You can use the form map = %{map | key: value}

You can do like this…

iex(1)> map = %{
  tasks: [
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 1, name: "walk the dog"},
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 2, name: "cook dinner"},
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 3, name: "laundry"}
  ]
}
iex(2)> i = 1
iex(3)> map = %{map | tasks: Enum.map(map.tasks, fn 
  task when task.id==id -> %{task | completed: true}
  task -> task 
end)}
%{
  tasks: [
    %{completed: true, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 1, name: "walk the dog"},
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 2, name: "cook dinner"},
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 3, name: "laundry"}
  ]
}
globalkeith

globalkeith

Another option is to use Kernel.update_in/3 which is intended to help with updating nested structures.

This will give you something to play with:

iex(1)> all = fn :get_and_update, data, next -> data |> Enum.map(next) |> Enum.unzip() end                                        
#Function<42.97283095/3 in :erl_eval.expr/5>
iex(2)> complete_item = fn list, id -> update_in(list, [:tasks, all], fn %{id: ^id} = t -> %{t | completed: true}; t -> t end) end
#Function<43.97283095/2 in :erl_eval.expr/5>
iex(3)> list = %{
...(3)>   tasks: [
...(3)>     %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 1, name: "walk the dog"},
...(3)>     %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 2, name: "cook dinner"},
...(3)>     %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 3, name: "laundry"}
...(3)>   ]
...(3)> }
%{
  tasks: [
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 1, name: "walk the dog"},
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 2, name: "cook dinner"},
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 3, name: "laundry"}
  ]
}
iex(4)> complete_item.(list, 2)
%{
  tasks: [
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 1, name: "walk the dog"},
    %{completed: true, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 2, name: "cook dinner"},
    %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", id: 3, name: "laundry"}
  ]
}
eksperimental

eksperimental

The way your list is structured is non-performant, because in order to find an ID you may have to traverse the whole list, and there could be duplicates.

If you convert tasks into a map being the map key the id of the task, you can do this much easier with (as @globalkeith suggested) Kernel.update_in/2 (note it is /2 in this case)

map = %{
  tasks: %{
    1 => %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", name: "walk the dog"},
    2 => %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", name: "cook dinner"},
    3 => %{completed: false, date_added: "3.18.2021", name: "laundry"}
  }
}

complete_item =
  fn(map, id) ->
    {_completed, update_map} = get_and_update_in(
      map[:tasks][id][:completed], fn completed -> {completed, true} end
    )
    update_map
  end

map = complete_item.(map, 1)

So your complete_item function could be rewritten like

def complete_item(map, id) do
  get_and_update_in(map[:tasks][id][:completed], &{&1, true})
  |> elem(1)
end
nazevedo3

nazevedo3 OP

Awesome, this is all really helpful, I appreciate it! @eksperimental - totally makes sense. I was considering changing the structure up because of that.

Thanks for the feedback!

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Stef-Verniers
Hello I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews