MartinVolerich
I have an Ash Domain called Flow.Model, that has a resource called Warehouse, that in turn has a relationship to many Tank(s).
The resource has relationships properly defined.
I want to provide a function in the domain that responds with the tanks for a warehouse.
A simple implementation is (of course):
def get_tanks_from_warehouse(warehouse) when is_struct(warehouse, Flow.Model.Warehouse) do
warehouse = warehouse |> Ash.load!(:tanks)
warehouse.tanks
end
Is this the best approach to use or is there a code_gen approach that can call an action to respond with the list of the “many” child resources?
Is it “wrong” to Ash.load the relationship this way in the plain Elixir function in the domain?
I’m keen to learn the best patterns to be using for the future.
Thanks
Martin
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #ai
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming











First Post!- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
mindok
I don’t know what would be considered best practice, but I’d almost certainly implement this as a read action against the tanks resource using a warehouse (or warehouse id) as an argument, then expose the action via a code interface.
I happened to have this page open on another browser tab: Actions — ash v3.29.3
Most Liked
barnabasJ
when you define a read action as a code interface you can also pass in a
loade.g. if you have
That will give you the warehouse including the tanks
zachdaniel
Nothing wrong with writing those functions, just up to you if you need the benefits of a generic action or not
Functions are a simple tool and often using a simple tool is good. Since you’re aware of what you can get from generic actions, you can ultimately decide whether or not you need a generic action or not.
I personally error on the side of making generic actions and when I need functions they typically exist for a reason and I group them in some way to indicate that reason. Like if I have common helpers for building a UI I might put those in their own module
MyApp.MyDomain.LiveViewHelpersor something along those lines. But when in doubt, finding a way to either extend an existing domain action or create a new one often yields better fruit down in the long run.MartinVolerich
Very clear and practical. Many thanks again.