jarlah
Is there any way to handle task termination gracefully?
When i do ctrl-c no form for shutdown hook is called in the task. I have yet to see an example or google search hit for something that shows how this can be solved.
Is it a futile project and a dead end? Will mix tasks always be hard killed with no way to gracefully shutdown?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 9- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
arcanemachine
I started using
Ctrl + \a while back and I think it is more graceful thanCtrl + c.jarlah
Might be, but im more interested in figuring out how to gracefully terminate a mix task from inside the task. But alas there does not seem to be passed events to the task from mix task execution system.
benwilson512
Maybe calling System.halt(0)
jarlah
Maybe, but it should be called when the task is being terminated from the outside. With Ctrl-c.
krasenyp
Well, Ctrl-C sends a SIGINT signal to the process. You should be able to do what you want using the signal handling capabilities of the kernel, more specifically
erl_signal_server.itzmidinesh
I use
System.stop()sometimes if I want to try graceful exit. But, I don’t think there is any issue doing Ctrl-c twice. Is there any specific reason for you to ask this?jarlah
its about a task in testcontainers for elixir, that spawns a database container, which can be reusable. When forcefully terminated, my thought was to stop the database container causing the spawned tests via System.cmd to fail and complete faster.
But as this thread has developed, there is no way to listen for an sigint interrupt in the task, which is sad because its a core feature that should be there.
But anyway, its no big deal really. I will just need to add a disclaimer that if the task is forcefully killed and if the container is reused, the tests will continue running happily until completed in the background and then die off. Which is not a big deal, unless you rerun the task which causes the same container to be reused and tables will be recreated, and might fail if the old test process is using the tables. slight annoyance maybe
jarlah
however not to brag or anything but
mix testcontainers.test --watch lib --watch testis pretty nice to work with with reusable database container. Just saying. Just wish i could cancel it. But now when i think about it, why should i need to cancel it? tests running for a long time and wont stop? hanging ? then it doesnt matter? maybe this is a figurative problem, a problem that doesnt exist? yes .. i think sojarlah
Btw. It is solved. By not using System.cmd and instead running tasks via Mix.Task.run. When i ran the task via System.cmd the spawned task outlived the task it was spawned from.