kgrvamsi

kgrvamsi

Hello Everyone

I’m working on a project which needs to use dynamic supervisor to support creating genserver based workers .

The code today can fork/spawn a worker and get attached to the parent dynamic supervisor but when i want to terminate i still see the process as part of the dynamic supervisor process.

Here is the code on the same

Dynamic supervisor code

defmodule Testing.WorkerSupervisor do
  @moduledoc """
      Worker Supervisor to support dynamic workers
  """
  use DynamicSupervisor
  require Logger

  def start_link(_) do
    Logger.debug("Starting the Worker Supervisor")
    DynamicSupervisor.start_link(__MODULE__, [], name: __MODULE__)
  end

  @impl true
  def init(_) do
    DynamicSupervisor.init(strategy: :one_for_one)
  end

  def start_task_worker(conn_id) do
    spec = {Testing.ConnectionWorker, %{conn_id: conn_id}}
    DynamicSupervisor.start_child(__MODULE__, spec)
  end

  def terminate_task_worker(pid) do
    Logger.info("Terminating the Worker")
    case DynamicSupervisor.terminate_child(__MODULE__, pid) do
      :ok ->
        Logger.info("Worker Terminated Successfully")

      {:error, _} ->
        Logger.info("PID not found")
    end
  end
end

The Processcheck worker who is part of the main supervisor i have this code

defmodule Testing.ConnectionWorker do
  @moduledoc false
  use GenServer, restart: :transient

state = %{
        conn_info: %{
              running: [%{
                       pid: "pid_id",
                       conn_name: "new worker"
               }]
         }
      }

Enum.each(diff, fn conn ->
            Enum.each(conn_info.running, fn run ->
              if conn == run.conn_name do
                IO.inspect(run.pid)
                Testing.WorkerSupervisor.terminate_task_worker(run.pid)
              end
            end)
          end)

When i see the process association with :observer.start i still see the worker attached to the Dynamic supervisor.

Am i doing the implementation wrong here?

Showing Posts 1 to 6

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

Hello welcome,

Try to change this…

use GenServer, restart: :transient

# to

use GenServer, restart: :temporary

… to test if it restarts or not (it should never restart). If not, it means on terminate_child, the worker does not stop with normal status, and so it is restarted because of transient.

BTW I usually stop GenServer from within, with a specific message, or under some conditions, but not from the supervisor itself, and not with terminate_child().

kgrvamsi

kgrvamsi OP

Hi @kokolegorille thanks for your response and just to my knowledge want to know what is the difference between the Dynamic Supervisor terminating its child vs child terminating it self over a call?

and also checking on your suggestion that terminating the child from the genserver it self so was checking around some example for it and saw this

defmodule Server do
  use GenServer

  def start do
    GenServer.start(__MODULE__, []) 
  end 

  def stop(pid) do
    GenServer.call(pid, :stop)
  end 

  def handle_call(:stop, _from, status) do
    {:stop, :normal, status}
  end 

  def terminate(reason, _status) do
    IO.puts "Asked to stop because #{inspect reason}"
    :ok 
  end 
end

Is this what you are recommending and any directions on how to fetch the child process pid in the supervisor and send a call to the Genserver to stop?

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

I always use DynamicSupervisor with Registry to help finding those workers by name.

kgrvamsi

kgrvamsi OP

@kokolegorille i’m using the ets tables and saving the genserver pid and the name associated to it and when i’m trying to kill it i’m sending a call to the genserver stop function to shutdown the process in normal mode.

send(PID, :stop)

in the Genserver

 def handle_call(:stop, _from, state) do
    {:stop, :normal, state}
  end

Please advice if i’m doing it in the right way.

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

The code is ok for stoping the GenServer, althought You might also use a cast instead of call.

The registry is ets based, no real need to duplicate it’s functionality by hand.

kgrvamsi

kgrvamsi OP

@kokolegorille thanks for the reply … your guidance is really helping me and making me love elixir more .

Here is the something i made a change as per your suggestions

@impl true
def handle_cast(:stop, state) do
    {:stop, :normal, state}
  end 

Infact i’m not directly using the ets table but using this library which is kinda wrapper on top of ETS ({:ets, “~> 0.7.3”}) but i will take your suggestions on using registry.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews