cjk
Hi there,
I use Cachex to cache very frequent queries:
@spec get_setting_for_forum(%Forum{}) :: %Setting{} | nil
def get_setting_for_forum(%Forum{} = forum) do
Cachex.fetch!(:cforum, "settings/forums/#{forum.forum_id}", fn ->
from(setting in Setting, where: setting.forum_id == ^forum.forum_id)
|> Repo.one()
end)
end
@spec get_setting_for_user(%User{}) :: %Setting{} | nil
def get_setting_for_user(%User{} = user) do
Cachex.fetch!(:cforum, "settings/users/#{user.user_id}", fn ->
from(setting in Setting, where: setting.user_id == ^user.user_id)
|> Repo.one()
end)
end
This function loads a settings object from the database. It works fine in production and dev code, but in tests I get this error:
** (Cachex.ExecutionError) connection not available and request was dropped from queue after 602ms. You can configure how long requests wait in the queue using :queue_target and :queue_interval. See DBConnection.start_link/2 for more information
I call the getter functions like this:
def load_relevant_settings(forum, user)
def load_relevant_settings(nil, nil) do
[get_global_setting()]
|> Enum.reject(&is_nil(&1))
end
def load_relevant_settings(%Forum{} = forum, nil) do
[get_global_setting(), get_setting_for_forum(forum)]
|> Enum.reject(&is_nil(&1))
end
def load_relevant_settings(nil, %User{} = user) do
[get_global_setting(), get_setting_for_user(user)]
|> Enum.reject(&is_nil(&1))
end
def load_relevant_settings(%Forum{} = forum, %User{} = user) do
[get_global_setting(), get_setting_for_forum(forum), get_setting_for_user(user)]
|> Enum.reject(&is_nil(&1))
end
I can’t figure out what’s going wrong. Has anybody an idea?
Edit: I already tried to set the pool size to a very high value (100), but it didn’t help.
Best regards,
CK
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Other Trending Topics
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
cjk
I think I figured out what happens. The full stacktrace is as follows:
The application is in the middle of a database operation. Since the
Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandboxadapter wraps every test case in a giant transaction there is only one ecto process available, right? This would then lead to a deadlock when requesting multiple times for a database connection, wouldn’t it?How can I circumvent this?
Edit: but if this is the case, why does everything work fine when not wrapping the getter functions in
Cachex.fetch?Best regards,
CK
cjk
I might have found the reason why it works when not using Cachex. Cachex spawns its own process, and the fallback function for querying the database gets executed in the context of the cachex process. And this process has no access to the database connection. Is this assumption right? If yes, how do I fix that w/o calling
Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.allow?benwilson512
You can do:
cjk
Hi Ben,
sadly that doesn’t change anything. I still get the timeouts:
This issue causes me headaches
cjk
I could do something like this:
This solves the issue but this just circumvents the problem. I’d like to understand what’s happening and how to fix it the right way[tm].
benwilson512
Oh sorry it’s a timeout issue not an ownership issue, that wasn’t clear to me initially since the first stack trace didn’t include the actual error message.
To clear up a misconception though:
no. There is a pool of connections. This makes it possible to do concurrent tests. Each concurrent test case would checkout a different connection, and then each start their own transaction. This is why the
caller:argument exists to Repo calls, it can indicate to Ecto which connection process to use.Unfortunately none of that really helps answer the timeout question. I’ll have to dig into Cachex to see how Cachex.fetch! works.
cjk
The ownership issue was just an assumption I made (thus the question mark
) because it works when called from outside of the process of cachex.
Well, I will dig deeper into cachex then, thanks.
lasseebert
I face the same issue, but not with Cachex, just with a normal ecto transaction.
I run a bunch of db operations inside a transaction. Inside the transaction I call some logic in another process that performs a db-lookup (in other tables). This works fine when not running tests, but in the test it dies with
connection not available and request was dropped from queue after 989ms.I have not found a way around this yet.
benwilson512
lasseebert
Thanks @benwilson512, but I already use
:sharedmode on the connection, so it shouldn’t make a difference. (I also tried and it didn’t).I don’t get the
cannot find ownership processerror, which would be solved withallow/3or:shared, but aconnection not available.For now, I “solved” the issue by replacing the db-call inside the existing transaction with a mock that does not hit the db.
Here is a small example that reproduces my issue:
This is the setup code that is run before each db test:
It will give this error: