chan11347

chan11347

i want to add a condition in the add_entry to limit the input such like if else in java, any help

server.ex

def add_entry(todo_server, new_entry) do
    GenServer.cast(todo_server, {:add_entry, new_entry})
  end
@impl GenServer
  def handle_cast({:add_entry, new_entry}, {name, todo_list}) do
    new_list = Todo.List.add_entry(todo_list, new_entry)
    Todo.Database.store(name, new_list)
    {:noreply, {name, new_list}}
  end

list.ex

def add_entry(todo_list, entry) do
    entry = Map.put(entry, :id, todo_list.auto_id)
    new_entries = Map.put(todo_list.entries, todo_list.auto_id, entry)

    %Todo.List{todo_list | entries: new_entries, auto_id: todo_list.auto_id + 1}
  end

First 10 of 22 Posts Switch mode

mindok

mindok

Depending on what you are trying to achieve, having multiple function heads for the add_entry function is idiomatic.

for example:

def add_entry(todo_list, %{thing: thing}=entry) when thing=="don't add me", do: todo_list

def add_entry(todo_list, %{}=entry)  do
 # what you had before
end

Alternatively, if you really want to use if, remember that it returns a value and you can’t modify variables with scope external to it, so you have to do something like:

  new_entries = if <some criteria> do
    Map.put(todo_list.entries, ...)
  else
    todo_list.entries # return the unaltered map if criteria don't apply
  end

If you want to spell out a bit more what you are trying to do we could give you the best option…

chan11347

chan11347 OP

Todo.Server.add_entry(test, %{date: ~D[2020-05-19], time: ~T[16:52:00], title: "Shopping"})
this is what the input and I want to set it if any of the value is nil or empty it return an IO statement " input cannot be empty and return to the same iex

chan11347

chan11347 OP

so follow the idea you gave is it like this?

def add_entry(todo_list, %{entries: entries}=entry) when entries  ==" ", do: IO.puts("input cannot be empty!")
end

def add_entry(todo_list, %{}=entry)  do
    entry = Map.put(entry, :id, todo_list.auto_id)
    new_entries = Map.put(todo_list.entries, todo_list.auto_id, entry)

    %Todo.List{todo_list | entries: new_entries, auto_id: todo_list.auto_id + 1}
end
mindok

mindok

Close…

def add_entry(todo_list, %{entries: entries}=entry) when entries  =="", do: todo_list

or…

def add_entry(todo_list, %{entries: entries}=entry) when entries  ==" "  do
  IO.puts("input cannot be empty!")
  todo_list # Return the unaltered input so the calling code is consistent
end
dimitarvp

dimitarvp

But the question here is: do you want to raise an exception, or return an erroneous value to the caller? If exception is fine, you can just pattern match the happy path like this:

def add_entry(list, %{entries: text}) when text != "" do
  # do stuff with valid input
end

Then, if the function is called with an empty entries key the runtime will just raise FunctionClauseError because there is no function that handles the empty value.

chan11347

chan11347 OP

what if I want to return an erroneous value?is that I need to set up an error statement by myself?

lucaong

lucaong

If your map contains keys like :date, :time, etc., then your code above won’t work (because it matches an entry with key :entries).

There are a few possible ways to solve this. First, you could check if any of the entry fields is blank. Remember that maps are Enumerable, so you can enumerate them as a collection of {key, value} with the Enum module:

def add_entry(todo_server, new_entry) do
  if Enum.any?(new_entry, fn {_key, value} -> value == nil || value == "" end) do
    IO.puts("input cannot be empty!")
  else
    GenServer.cast(todo_server, {:add_entry, new_entry})
  end
end

Instead of printing an output though, it would be better to return an error, so the caller can pattern match easily. Usually, one would return :ok or {:error, reason}:

def add_entry(todo_server, new_entry) do
  if Enum.any?(new_entry, fn {_key, value} -> value == nil || value == "" end) do
    {:error, "input cannot be empty!"}
  else
    GenServer.cast(todo_server, {:add_entry, new_entry})
  end
end

If the entries always have the same keys, there is a possibly better way to do this: you can use a struct for the entry, instead of a map, to enforce the “shape” of the entry:

defmodule Todo.Server do
  defmodule Entry do
    @enforce_keys [:date, :time, :title]
    defstruct [:date, :time, :title]
  end

  def add_entry(todo_server, %Entry{date: date, time: time, title: title})
  when is_nil(date) or is_nil(time) or is_nil(title) or title == "" do
    {:error, "input cannot be empty!"}
  end

  def add_entry(todo_server, new_entry = %Entry{}) do
    GenServer.cast(todo_server, {:add_entry, new_entry})
  end

  def add_entry(_server, _entry), do: {:error, "Invalid input"}
end

This way, the entry is now a struct that enforces that all of :date, :time, and :value are present. This also mean, though, that the caller of the add_entry function has to pass an Entry struct instead of a map, so it’s your choice whether this is desirable or not.

P.S.:
Unrelated to your question, but you might want to use GenServer.call/3 instead of GenServer.cast/2, even if you don’t need a result. The reason is explained here: https://elixir-lang.org/getting-started/mix-otp/genserver.html#call-cast-or-info

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

Show us what you have tried to make the function return an error value?

chan11347

chan11347 OP

so if i not enter both value there will having a crash appear


so i want to make it limited at the input part to stop this happening

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
jonnycharles
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
spammy
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
dli
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app? Looking for hints regarding: Addi...
New
roeland
Kia ora, We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
bottlenecked
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps. Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
rahultumpala
Hello, I have an Elixir backend that implements a custom protocol over TCP. I want to load test the backend and assess the performance o...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge &amp; Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
ausimian
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement