baldmountain
Having worked a bit with Clojure’s threading operators → and ->> I find that sometimes I’d like a pipe end operator like Clojure’s ->> operator. What this would do is pass the piped value at the end of the parameter
list rather than the beginning. I’ve seen code that overcomes this shortcoming like this
data
|> &(do_something(var, &1)).()
Instead it would be nice if we could instead do:
data
|>> do_something(var)
Sorry if this has been suggested before.
Where Next?
Trending in Discussions
Other Trending Topics
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
Elixir, Erlang & messaging conferences from Code Sync. Next up: ElixirConf US (10–11 Sep) & Code BEAM Europe (21–22 Oct), Haarlem + online.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Error tracking, logs, uptime, and Just Enough APM. Built for developers.
Bringing learning, work and compliance together since 1987.
Producing high quality Elixir screencasts since 2017.
The deployment platform built for Elixir: PaaS ease, VPS control.
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"
Showing Posts 1 to 5- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
CptnKirk
https://github.com/taiansu/pipe_to
Supports piping to any location.
benwilson512
It gets suggested every 6 months or so. Unless this brings something new to those discussions I’m probably going to suggest we lock the thread so we can avoid just having the same conversation again.
kokolegorille
It’s also not too complicated to replace it with
benwilson512
The general answer here is to not pipe to anonymous functions at all, but create a
defpnamed function that does the swap. This is almost always superior because names are rarely bidirectional. IE most function names don’t read as well if the order of the arguments is switched, so writing adefpgives you the opportunity to reword things properly.baldmountain
I figured that would be the case. The fact that it keeps coming up may mean it’s worth considering.
But I’m fine with locking the thread and letting it go.