montogeek
Hi!
I was going to post this in GitHub but I think it is better here.
Would you accept a PR to upgrade to webpack 5?
Cheers!
Trending in Discussions
As the title says, please share what you’ve been up to with Elixir. Whether that’s been learning it, looking into it, making stuff with i...
New
The obligatory hello world thread!
Who are you and where are you from? :stuck_out_tongue:
New
I want to open this thread for you all to discuss and help those who really like Ash but are still hesitant to use it in a real project. ...
New
I was working on an Ecto migration and I needed a timestamp. So, for the nth time, I looked up the different data types for timestamps, a...
New
Fly’s CEO posted this recently - Turn And Face The Strange · The Fly Blog
It says that Fly is going all-in on sprites, which is a worry ...
New
We’re evaluating API mocking tools for OpenAPI-based projects and would love to hear what other teams are using.
We’re particularly inte...
New
Is there a word for the ~> symbol used in Version strings?
Do you also just call it a Squiggle Arrow™ ?!
New
Other Trending Topics
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
There are three potential reasons for members of this forum to have a look at https://vutuv.de
You are tired or annoyed of LinkedIn.
Yo...
New
Aludel - LLM Evaluation Workbench
Aludel is an embeddable Phoenix LiveView dashboard for evaluating and comparing LLM prompts across mult...
New
Latest Phoenix Threads
Latest on Elixir Forum
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
mindok
I’d say post to github (raise an issue with the offer of the PR) or the appropriate slack channel…
outlog
webpack5 is brand new - so it could be a stopper for people at present as the whole eco system has to catch up..
say I do phx new (that includes webpack5), and then want to drop in a react SPA, I’ll run into webpack5 issues.. so I would probably say some 6 months, before the entire system has caught up..
(that said a PR, showing how simple/complex the upgrade is would be awesome..)
montogeek
Will create it then
outlog
just be to clear I have no saying in PR/merging for phoenix, but from experience there is a philosophy of keeping the phoenix webpack config as simple/minimal as possible, so strive for that, and go for minimal changes/complexity/features..
webuhu
@montogeek I could assist the PR.
hard-source-webpack-plugincould be removed in my understanding with webpack v5.In
dev.exs--watch-stdinneeds to be replaced with--watch+--watch-options-stdin.In case for keeping it as simple/minimal as possible,
I would propose to replace additionally within
package.json:with
Very opinionated, as I think webpack is to verbose,
I always also add
--stats errors-onlyfor deployand
--stats minimalfor development to the webpack commands.ondrej-tucek
Well, from my recently experience with webpack 5, when I replaced
--watch-stdinto--watch --watch-options-stdinthen watching files for updates stopped working. For instance, when I changed some content of css/scss/… no compilation happened. So I ended up only with--watch, but a few deprecation warning shown during compilation. Also if you usemini-css-extract-pluginyou have to addpublicPath. In my case was successfulpolypush135
Wepack 5 breaks the way I was chunking my file names.
Specifically, Output.chunkFilename is dead, hard-source-webpack-plugin is broken
And I’ve had to fix the way I bundle wasm and how I resolve two libs now that they don’t include the core nodejs libs.
https://github.com/MorphicPro/morphic.pro/pull/254/files#diff-d39fdca60f5c65460eef279b514c898ded5b0ac5eab453ab1d4fe9d54032a2dbR28-R39
At the end of the day Output.chunkFilename has prevented me from fully upgrading because I’m not sure how to still bundle out my vendor.bundle.js and it now looks to just be broken.
I really hate webpack.
montogeek
I won’t work on this, discouraged by these statements:
Feel free anybody to pick it.
mindok
I think you should be encouraged rather than discouraged! I think many of us have been frustrated with webpack from time to time and that frustration can result in saying something without thinking about the consequences. I personally find it difficult to work with. But it is an essential part of modern web apps so I’m delighted that someone is putting their hand up to smooth out the bumps of a version upgrade.
polypush135
Imagine you lived in a world where everyone massaged everyone’s ego because everyone was too sensitive to say what they really feel. Yeah, I hate webpack, Who fucking cares. And guess what, It’s possible to make bad software and it’s possible that software causes real pain for their users. Any good dev knows the first rule to good design is to be empathetic so if anything I’m doing the devs of Webpack a favor by not sugar-coating how painful the process currently is. That should be in its self an indication that more energy really should go to identify the problems they cause for their users otherwise they may not have users to care anymore. And if you are so sensitive that the mention of dislike persuades you from trying then boy you are in the wrong industry. Everyone will hit these points in their dev career, try to move past the small talk and not be so squishy.
Also in my context I’m not using the default Phoenix webpack config, because I like to chunk out my vendor and my app into separate files which is where I currently hit the wall. So your efforts will not be likely impacted by the issues I’ve identified.