alvises

alvises

After benchmarking queues they seem much faster than Lists on
appending.

  • [1,...1000] ++ [1001] O(n)
  • :queue.in(1,q) should be O(1) right?

last element

  • List.last([1,..,1000]) again O(n)
  • :queue.get_r(q) again O(1)

and they should be similar on prepending

  • List [0 | [1,..,1000]]
  • :queue.in_r(0,q)

Now, seeing queues implementation it seems reasonable. A queue generated from a list of numbers from 1 to 1000 is implemented as a tuple of two lists.

{ [1000, 999, 998,.., 501], [1, 2, 3, 4, .., 500] }

So the list is split in two and the last half part of the list is reversed. Since prepending an item in a list is fast O(1) then appending 1001 is fast because 1001 is prepended to the first list in the tuple. Same thing for getting the last element, with lists is O(n) and while with :queue is O(1).

My question is, what are the downsides of using queues over lists? Maybe enumerating the numbers from 500 to 1000 since that list is reversed?
Some rebalancing when enqueueing new elements?

Showing Posts 1 to 3

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

Your intuition is correct - the documentation for :queue has a list of slow operations:

All operations [have] an amortized O(1) running time, except
filter/2, join/2, len/1, member/2, split/2 that have O(n).

See also the paper referenced in those docs, “Purely Functional Data Structures” by Chris Okasaki for detailed analysis.

10
Post #1
alvises

alvises OP

Thanks a lot for the pdf! Super interesting!!

Isn’t len O(n) also on lists?

len/1 couldn’t it be made O(1) wrapping the queue around a struct, which has a :count field that is incremented/decremented at each operation?

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
RemyXRenard
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
samoloth
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
FlyingNoodle
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
ryanwinchester
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted” Version...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews