ariandanim
Does it okay if I never use mix test?
I am currently developing app but never try to use mix test, because some of code I made custom in lib folder, sometime when i try make account like mix phx.gen.auth Accounts User users, i try to made custom in the code. but when try make mix test some failure comes in like below :
1) test confirm email does not update email with invalid token (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:192
match (=) failed
code: assert {:live_redirect, %{to: path, flash: flash}} = redirect
left: {:live_redirect, %{flash: flash, to: path}}
right: {
:redirect,
%{
flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."},
to: "/users/log_in"
}
}
stacktrace:
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:194: (test)
2) test update email form renders errors with invalid data (phx-submit) (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:68
** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
stacktrace:
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:69: (test)
3) test Settings page renders settings page (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:9
** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
code: {:ok, _lv, html} =
stacktrace:
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:10: (test)
.
4) test update email form updates the user email (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:35
** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
stacktrace:
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:38: (test)
.
5) test update email form renders errors with invalid data (phx-change) (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:52
** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
stacktrace:
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:53: (test)
...
6) test update password form renders errors with invalid data (phx-change) (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:121
** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
stacktrace:
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:122: (test)
.
7) test confirm email updates the user email once (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:174
match (=) failed
code: assert {:live_redirect, %{to: path, flash: flash}} = redirect
left: {:live_redirect, %{flash: flash, to: path}}
right: {
:redirect,
%{
flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."},
to: "/users/log_in"
}
}
stacktrace:
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:177: (test)
...
8) test update password form renders errors with invalid data (phx-submit) (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:140
** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
stacktrace:
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:141: (test)
.
9) test update password form updates the user password (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:92
** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
stacktrace:
test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:95: (test)
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 8- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
emadb
Maybe, I don’t understand what are you asking.
If you don’t want to write test, you can avoid to run
mix test.The failing tests that you are showing have a pretty clear error message and should be easy to fix them in you want.
Try to explain better your problem. Thank you.
zachallaun
When you generate anything with Phoenix, it generates code in
liband tests for that code intest. Naturally, changing the code will cause tests relying on that code to fail. Update your tests or, if you must, delete the failing tests so that at least the remaining ones can be useful.dimitarvp
Tests are written so you’re sure you’re delivering working code. If you’re one of the gods who know their code works without tests then don’t run them.
D4no0
Working code is optional, getting paid is the important part
.
LostKobrakai
Don’t forget that not everyone is coding for professional reasons. Also automated tests are not the only form of testing. So even with automated tests being a useful tool they’re by no means generally required.
To answer the question though: Yes phoenix cannot automatically adjust tests to take authentication into account, given it has no idea about what content should require authentication or not. Therefore adjusting the automatically generated tests for those additional concerns is required.
dimitarvp
Even in hobby code at one point you want to make sure the thing works, no? Manual testing does not scale.
LostKobrakai
I mean I don’t disagree, but on the other hand it depends on the context. I’ve for a long time worked on a project, which had (and still has) not much time sensitivity and also not much scale. For quite a bit in the beginning this ran on a system without automated tests (a constraint of the underlying architecture). It wasn’t great, but it also wasn’t too bad. It at least was better than the manual stuff it had replaced. Eventually we switched architecture (to elixir).
So for sure there are many ways where skipping testing can turn on you, but I try to not discredit other paths.
dimitarvp
I didn’t intend to discredit it, sorry if it sounded that way.
And, as I work for a telecom nowadays I get it that not everything can be neatly put into automated tests indeed. Or stuff like Nerves[-like] environments where you actually have to send physical signals – another valid use-case.
So yeah I don’t disagree with you either, it’s just that I’d always default to automated tests if the environment allows for it. If for no any other reason than this one: from one point and on I want to progress and automated tests give you confidence that you at least didn’t break what was working before.