tim2CF
Let’s say we have a module like
defmodule Foo do
@salt Application.get_env(:foo, :salt, [])
def hash(password) do
try do
{:ok, md5(password, @salt)}
rescue
e -> {:error, {e, __STACKTRACE__}}
end
end
defp md5(password, salt = [_ | _]) do
Enum.reduce(salt, password, &:erlang.md5(&2<>&1))
end
end
And when we call &hash/1 function it returns error
iex(19)> Foo.hash "123"
{:error,
{%FunctionClauseError{
args: nil,
arity: 2,
clauses: nil,
function: :md5,
kind: nil,
module: Foo
},
[
{Foo, :md5, ["123", []], [file: 'iex', line: 27]},
{Foo, :hash, 1, [file: 'iex', line: 22]},
{:erl_eval, :do_apply, 6, [file: 'erl_eval.erl', line: 677]},
{:elixir, :eval_forms, 4, [file: 'src/elixir.erl', line: 265]},
{IEx.Evaluator, :handle_eval, 5, [file: 'lib/iex/evaluator.ex', line: 249]},
{IEx.Evaluator, :do_eval, 3, [file: 'lib/iex/evaluator.ex', line: 229]},
{IEx.Evaluator, :eval, 3, [file: 'lib/iex/evaluator.ex', line: 207]},
{IEx.Evaluator, :loop, 1, [file: 'lib/iex/evaluator.ex', line: 94]}
]}}
And we want to put this stacktrace to Logger (let’s say for easier debugging)
But we see, what stacktrace can contain sensitive data (in example is password = “123”)
Of course we can remove all arguments from stacktrace manually, but in most cases arguments are useful
Maybe there is already implemented solution to remove some arguments of some functions from stacktrace by marking them in module definition somehow?
It would be nice to say somehow that n-th argument of foo function in module Bar is sensitive and should be excluded from stacktrace
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Most Liked- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
sfusato
There is ‘Custom struct inspections’ that was just released with Elixir 1.8:
https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/blob/v1.8/CHANGELOG.md
Maybe return just the tail of the stack trace and at an upper-level inspect your struct with the returned stack trace. This would obfuscate the password field or whatever you set to hide from your struct.
josevalim
Here is what Plug.Crypto does regarding the stacktrace: plug_crypto/lib/plug/crypto/key_generator.ex at 76a595f26529cd550f32166c3288358e1785fb1f · elixir-plug/plug_crypto · GitHub
Last Post!
chocolatedonut
Despite all the helpful tips, I still am not able to hide password of the following
:gen_statem-based RabbitMQ consumer:I’d like that the
:configfield (above), which includes the password, be hidden in all these cases::sys.get_state Rabbit.ConsumerRabbit.Consumeroutright crashes and produces such stacktrace (observepasswordin plain sight)What I tried already
format_statusI added
:gen_statemc:format_status/2and also OTP 25 c:format_status/1:This did help as
:sys.get_statusdidn’t print the sensitive:configanymore. But, it didn’t help with neither of the cases 1. or 2. above.Prune args from stacktrace
I wrapped
Rabbit.Consumer’s call to a different process with arescueand pruned args fromSystem.stacktrace()(using the suggestedPlug.Crypto.prune_args_from_stacktrace/1). But, this doesn’t help when:gen_statem/Rabbit.Consumeritself crashes. How can oneprune_args_from_stacktraceof the process itself (be it GenServer, :gen_statem, etc.)?Process.flag(:sensitive, true)Neither of the cases 1. or 2. above were solved.
Docs for the
:sensitiveflag sayThe following bolded part from above
made me hopeful that state will also be included (among disabled features).
So, I saw the following on erlef.github.io:
Alas, this doesn’t seem to be true -
:sys.get_state Rabbit.Consumerstill shows the password.Here’s this section verbatim: