disappearer

disappearer

Hello :slight_smile:
Recently we have been developing an application that uses Phoenix channels. It has rooms that users can join and each room has a state which is managed through a genserver. The room channel handles various messages and delegates to the genserver which has the corresponding functions for most of the messages. We are doing it the TDD way and I really like that, but I have a feeling that we have written too much tests and it’s become a big mess. The fact is that both the genserver and the channel are covered with tests that mostly test the same things twice. A lot of the times when I changed something I had to change both the channel and the genserver tests. I think the reason why this test suite ended up like that is that the channel and the genserver were developed simultaneously and almost separately by 2-3 people, mostly beginners in this area.

I want to develop a similar application on my own and would like to not make the same mistakes again, so I would like to confirm that what I’m thinking is right. My takeaway from this is that there’s no need to write unit tests for genservers, since the only thing that’s really exposed is the channel. I would decouple the tests from the implementation and just test the exposed behavior. 1. Do you agree?
2. Is there a scenario where it makes sense to write unit tests for genservers?
3. Is it worth the time and effort to clean up the test suite of our existing project?
4. Are there any tools which could tell me if a test is obsolete?

Thanks!

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
RemyXRenard
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
samoloth
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
FlyingNoodle
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
ryanwinchester
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted” Version...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews