saleyn
Is there a way to create a macro called required that could be used like this:
with required(var) <- Map.get(map, key) do
var
else
nil -> raise RuntimeError
end
I tried something like this, but it doesn’t work:
defmacro required(var) do
quote do
unquote(var) when not is_nil(var)
end
end
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
kip
I don’t think a macro can return just the match part of a
with(but happy to be wrong). Nevertheless, this looks more complex that the use case demands.Map.fetch!/2does basically the same thing:so you could simply:
Even in this case, its not very idiomatic since
with’s value is to program “happy path” and therefore thewithseems redundant in this example and the following would be the simplest:saleyn
While Map.fetch!/2 is a viable option for simple cases, consider:
If we wanted to get rid of the wrapper, we could do:
But wouldn’t it be nice to be able to do:
Maybe there is a way to come up with such a
required/1macro that would only add a singlewhenguard to the AST?keep_zen
In the FP, there is a functor named Maybe.
I think Maybe can replace the
with.Like:
kip
Perhaps I’m missing something, but this is very similar (but not the same) to:
The difference being that if the key exists and its value is
nilthen it will still pass unlike your example. Normally when I see use cases like “required” its a data validation case and changesets become a good tool of choice.