stefanchrobot

stefanchrobot

I’m trying to set up a RabbitMQ consumer using the amqp library. I want to process multiple messages concurrently and properly handle errors (properly reject message if a processing error occurs). How would I go about doing this?

The “Setup a consumer GenServer” example defines a single GenServer that spawns a new process for each incoming message which paired with prefetch_count > 1 allows for concurrent processing of the messages.

How do I make sure that those processes are cleaned up properly? Is spawn_link enough to shut them down when the parent GenServer is shutting down?
Should those processes live under a supervision tree?
How would I implement a timeout for processing of a message (kill it after 5seconds)?
The example says “You might also want to catch :exit signal in production code.” Why? When would that happen? How do I do that?
Are these consumer processes a use case for Tasks or DynamicSupervisor?
Or should this be set up totally differently, i.e. have a Supervisor with N workers where each one is a consumer on a shared connection?

Showing Posts 2 to 1

blatyo

blatyo

Conduit Core Team

You might find my library useful for this. It handles all the process and error stuff for you.

https://github.com/conduitframework/conduit

These slides give you idea of the code you would write.

Even if you don’t use it, you can see how those types of things are handled here.

https://github.com/conduitframework/conduit_amqp

EDIT: If you do use it and discover something that’s not well documented. Please file a ticket or a PR for it.

tcoopman

tcoopman

What I’ve done is the following. I’ve created a wrapper for a Connection and for a Channel.

The wrapper for the Connection starts a new connection in the init and traps exits Process.flag(:trap_exit,t rue) and it links the pid of the connection Process.link(connection.pid)`

So something like this:

{:ok, conn} = AMQP.Connection.open(...)

Process.flag(:trap_exit, true)
Process.link(conn.pid)

As a last thing, I’ll implement the terminate callback and try to close the Connection/Channel if it still lives.

For Channel I do the same thing. In my code I put my Connection and Channel wrappers in a supervision tree so that they get killed if needed.

I’m not sure that this is the correct way, but it works to have no zombie channels when something goes wrong in my code.
I was thinking about asking this in the amqp repository, why the Connection and Channel are no otp behaviours, because if they were, the wrappers wouldn’t be necessary.

See this topic as well: Processing multiple messages in parallel with AMQP

You basically setup one connection and multiple channels.
For error handling and timeouts. In the handle_info that receives the message I start a task and await it with a sensible timeout. If it’s to slow, or something fails you can do your error handling.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews