madeinussr
Hi, all,
Mb it’s silly question
, but: is there any possibility to define a behaviour in a function’s spec?
for example we have:
defmodule SomeBehaviour do
@callback do_it() :: any()
end
defmodule Adopter1 do
@behaviour SomeBehaviour
def do_it(), do: :done
end
defmodule Adopter2 do
@behaviour SomeBehaviour
def do_it(), do: :not_done
end
defmodule SomeModule do
# So, what's the right @spec for this function, if I'd like to specify SomeBehaviour adopters usage?
# The first thought is to use just SomeBehaviour.t with @type t :: __MODULE__ in SomeBehaviour definition,
# but as for me it seems too strict and any adopter will not pass the check
def do_it_with(adopter), do: adopter.do_it()
end
Thanks.
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
Hi all,
I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
How do I tell Hologram not to escape HTML when substituting into templates?
{Textile.render(@product.long_description)}
escapes the HTM...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
I’d like to create a file with 600 permissions (rw-------), but there’s a race condition if I create it and then change the permissions. ...
New
Is there a way to import record definitions in the iex shell for pretty printing (similar to the rr command in the erl shell)? This woul...
New
When I use Mix.install with a git dependency, using git@github.com:... how do I change the SSH identity used?
I’ve got two Github accoun...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey there,
I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first.
...
New
Hi everyone :waving_hand:
I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly)
AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #code-sync
- #discussion
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #elixirconf-eu
- #processes
- #security
- #api
- #forms
- #performance










Showing Posts 1 to 2- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
michalmuskala
Probably the best you can do is to spec it as
module- the type system is not powerful enough to express something more advanced.The idea to add
@type t :: modulein the behaviour is probably a good one. While it’s still the same when checked with dialyzer, it expresses much more when treating type specs as documentation.madeinussr
Unfortunately
well, let it be
@type t :: module+@spec(SomeBehaviour.t)will check just for any module, not a behaviour adopter.