david234
I have this form
<%= form_for @conn, Routes.admin_products_path(@conn, :create_product), [as: :create_product, id: "product-form", class: "mt-5 mb-5 login-input", method: :post, multipart: :true], fn f -> %>
<div class="form-group">
<%= text_input f, :name, placeholder: "Name", class: "form-control" %>
</div>
<div class="form-group">
<%= text_input f, :description, placeholder: "Description", class: "form-control" %>
</div>
<h4 class="card-title">Image Upload</h4>
<div class="form-group">
<%= file_input f, :image_files, name: "create_product[images][]", multiple: true, class: "form-control", placeholder: "Upload Image" %>
</div>
<h4 class="card-title">Video Upload</h4>
<div class="form-group">
<%= file_input f, :video_files, name: "create_product[videos][]", multiple: true, class: "form-control", placeholder: "Upload Image" %>
</div>
<br/><br/>
<input type="submit" value="Save" class="btn btn-dark mb-2" />
<% end %>
I have this three function to filter and process through Guard
def create_product(conn, %{"create_product" => product_params}) when is_list(product_params["images"]) == true and is_list(product_params["videos"]) == true do
def create_product(conn, %{"create_product" => product_params}) when is_list(product_params["images"]) == true and is_list(product_params["videos"]) == false do
def create_product(conn, %{"create_product" => product_params}) when is_list(product_params["images"]) == false and is_list(product_params["videos"]) == true do
Below is my inspect output
%{
"description" => "sdfdf",
"images" => [
[
%Plug.Upload{
content_type: "image/jpeg",
filename: "deuteronomy-2223-eggstransvestite-transvestism-cross-dressing-cult-prostitutes-lost-and-found-35-638.jpg",
path: "/tmp/plug-1586/multipart-1586529347-447222130427589-1"
}
]
],
"name" => "Sony"
}
I can see this error is due to accessing product_params["images"].
Can anyone give me insight on how to solve this? Or is there any better way to filter this. Your help is greatly appreciated
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
benwilson512
Hi @david234, you need to write it like this:
Basically, you need to pattern match out the values you want to use in the guards. Do note that the clause won’t match at all unless the product params include BOTH images and videos. If you need to handle them not being present at all, I’d consider doing this just inside the function body.
david234
thanks @benwilson512 for your response. So i wrote like this
Do you think it is wise to do in this way? Or else I will write only one function inside that I will do all the filters. Which way is better?
I want to improve my coding standard so only asking this.
benwilson512
Without know what you’re doing in the function body it’s hard to say. Personally I’d probably do something more like:
But again, it depends on what you’re doing. If each of those clauses is a wildly different flow then go ahead with the pattern you have. If you’re just using it to normalize the data or something then I think that can be accomplished more succinctly by working with the parameters more individually.
david234
Thank you very much @benwilson512