david234
I have this form
<%= form_for @conn, Routes.admin_products_path(@conn, :create_product), [as: :create_product, id: "product-form", class: "mt-5 mb-5 login-input", method: :post, multipart: :true], fn f -> %>
<div class="form-group">
<%= text_input f, :name, placeholder: "Name", class: "form-control" %>
</div>
<div class="form-group">
<%= text_input f, :description, placeholder: "Description", class: "form-control" %>
</div>
<h4 class="card-title">Image Upload</h4>
<div class="form-group">
<%= file_input f, :image_files, name: "create_product[images][]", multiple: true, class: "form-control", placeholder: "Upload Image" %>
</div>
<h4 class="card-title">Video Upload</h4>
<div class="form-group">
<%= file_input f, :video_files, name: "create_product[videos][]", multiple: true, class: "form-control", placeholder: "Upload Image" %>
</div>
<br/><br/>
<input type="submit" value="Save" class="btn btn-dark mb-2" />
<% end %>
I have this three function to filter and process through Guard
def create_product(conn, %{"create_product" => product_params}) when is_list(product_params["images"]) == true and is_list(product_params["videos"]) == true do
def create_product(conn, %{"create_product" => product_params}) when is_list(product_params["images"]) == true and is_list(product_params["videos"]) == false do
def create_product(conn, %{"create_product" => product_params}) when is_list(product_params["images"]) == false and is_list(product_params["videos"]) == true do
Below is my inspect output
%{
"description" => "sdfdf",
"images" => [
[
%Plug.Upload{
content_type: "image/jpeg",
filename: "deuteronomy-2223-eggstransvestite-transvestism-cross-dressing-cult-prostitutes-lost-and-found-35-638.jpg",
path: "/tmp/plug-1586/multipart-1586529347-447222130427589-1"
}
]
],
"name" => "Sony"
}
I can see this error is due to accessing product_params["images"].
Can anyone give me insight on how to solve this? Or is there any better way to filter this. Your help is greatly appreciated
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
Hey guys,
I’ve got a huge CSV ( around 10 GB ) that needs to be processed hourly
Do you guys have any suggestions what is the best prac...
New
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app?
Looking for hints regarding:
Addi...
New
Kia ora,
We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps.
Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #ai
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All Posts (oldest first)
- Show All Posts (newest first)
benwilson512
Hi @david234, you need to write it like this:
Basically, you need to pattern match out the values you want to use in the guards. Do note that the clause won’t match at all unless the product params include BOTH images and videos. If you need to handle them not being present at all, I’d consider doing this just inside the function body.
david234
thanks @benwilson512 for your response. So i wrote like this
Do you think it is wise to do in this way? Or else I will write only one function inside that I will do all the filters. Which way is better?
I want to improve my coding standard so only asking this.
benwilson512
Without know what you’re doing in the function body it’s hard to say. Personally I’d probably do something more like:
But again, it depends on what you’re doing. If each of those clauses is a wildly different flow then go ahead with the pattern you have. If you’re just using it to normalize the data or something then I think that can be accomplished more succinctly by working with the parameters more individually.
david234
Thank you very much @benwilson512