ryanwinchester
In Ecto.Changeset — Ecto v3.14.0 there is a part which says:
The
:deleteoption in particular must be used carefully as it would allow users to delete any associated data. If you need deletion, it is often preferred to add a separate boolean virtual field to the changeset function that will allow you to manually mark it for deletion, as in the example below: […]
defmodule Comment do
use Ecto.Schema
import Ecto.Changeset
schema "comments" do
field :body, :string
field :delete, :boolean, virtual: true
end
def changeset(comment, params) do
cast(comment, params, [:body, :delete])
|> maybe_mark_for_deletion
end
defp maybe_mark_for_deletion(changeset) do
if get_change(changeset, :delete) do
%{changeset | action: :delete}
else
changeset
end
end
end
However, this example is incomplete and I am having trouble applying that.
Carrying on with the comment theme, If I have this as the schema that inserts it with cast_assoc, where can I mark it as deleted? :
(I know it’s weird to have one comment but that’s the type of relationship I’m using in my actual code, so I want to keep the example similar)
defmodule Post do
use Ecto.Schema
import Ecto.Changeset
schema "posts" do
field(:title, :string)
field(:body, :string)
has_one(:comment, Comment)
end
def update_changeset(post, attrs) do
post
|> Repo.preload(:comment)
|> cast(attrs, [:title, :body])
|> cast_assoc(:comment, required: true, on_replace: :nilify)
end
end
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
nico_amsterdam
The complete explanation is here
so in schema “comments” you have correctly:
field :delete, :boolean, virtual: true
and if you update a Post containing a Comment and this comment has the value ‘true’ for the ‘delete’ field, it will be marked for deletion, and it will be deleted.
I did find the name ‘on_replace’ confusing. It specifies what to do when you don’t send an update for a child that does exists in the database. I would call it something like: ‘on_missing’ or ‘on_no_update_for’.
And the only values it can have are :raise (default), :mark_as_invalid, :nilify, :update, or :delete.
Maybe it’s me, but what I want is an option like :ignore / :nothing.
ryanwinchester
But won’t that mark the latest comment for deletion?
I want the one being replaced to be marked for deletion…
nico_amsterdam
In your case a post can have only one comment, so there is only one comment that could be deleted.
So either you update the Post with the Comment with delete=true in the comment, and that comment (with the same id) will be delete,
or you specify on_replace: :delete and update the Post without any comments or with a new comment, and the on_replace will delete the existing comment.