jeromedoyle

jeromedoyle

Does anyone have an example of using Ecto Schemas for parsing JSON api responses?
I’m curious how you can convert this

{
    "id": 283230,
    "fname": "John",
    "lname": "Smith",
    "email": "john.smith@example.com",
    "createdOn": "2016-03-31T10:49:11.386-05:00",
    "updatedOn": "2016-10-31T16:36:12.968-05:00",
    "_embedded": {
      "addresses": [
        {
          "city": "Minneapolis",
          "state": "MN"
        },
        {
          "city": "New Orleans",
          "state": "LA"
        }
      ]
    }
}

into this

%User{
  id: 283230,
  fname: "John",
  lname: "Smith",
  email: "john.smith@example.com",
  createdOn: "2016-03-31T10:49:11.386-05:00",
  updatedOn: "2016-10-31T16:36:12.968-05:00",
  addresses: [
    %Address{
      "city": "Minneapolis",
      "state": "MN"
    },
    %Address{
      "city": "New Orleans",
      "state": "LA"
    }
  ]
}

Showing Posts 1 to 6

NobbZ

NobbZ

Poison and its protocols are designed for this.

There might be alternatives available, but poison is in phoenix by default.

jeromedoyle

jeromedoyle OP

Thanks @NobbZ. I have written my own implementation of Poison.Decoder in the past, but thought I saw somewhere that this was possible with Ecto and was curious how it was done.

OvermindDL1

OvermindDL1

Via poison’s protocol it is yes. :slight_smile:

tme_317

tme_317

Hi @jeromedoyle,

If you want to use Ecto rather than Poison’s protocols, here is an example.

I’m just casting the API response but you could also add Changeset validations if you want and only returning if valid? == true. Hope this helps!

defmodule MyApp.SmartyUSStreet.Response do
  use Ecto.Schema

  alias MyApp.Addresses.Address

  import Ecto.Changeset

  @primary_key false
  embedded_schema do
    field :input_id
    field :input_index, :integer
    field :candidate_index, :integer
    field :addressee
    field :delivery_line_1
    field :delivery_line_2
    field :last_line
    field :delivery_point_barcode

    embeds_one :components, Components do
      field :street_name
      field :city_name
      field :default_city_name
      field :state_abbreviation
      field :zipcode
      field :plus4_code
      # ...
    end

    embeds_one :metadata, Metadata do
      field :record_type
      field :zip_type
      field :county_fips
      field :county_name
      # ...
    end

    embeds_one :analysis, Analysis do
      field :dpv_match_code
      field :dpv_footnotes
      field :dpv_cmra
      # ...
    end
  end

  def list_from_json(data) when is_binary(data) do
    Poison.decode!(data) |> list_from_json()
  end

  def list_from_json(data) when is_list(data) do
    data
    |> Enum.map(fn x -> list_from_json(x) end)
    |> List.flatten()
  end

  def list_from_json(data) when is_map(data) do
    %__MODULE__{}
    |> cast(data, castable_fields(__MODULE__))
    |> cast_embed(:components, with: &embedded_changeset/2)
    |> cast_embed(:metadata, with: &embedded_changeset/2)
    |> cast_embed(:analysis, with: &embedded_changeset/2)
    |> apply_changes()
    |> List.wrap()
  end

  def castable_fields(schema_module) do
    schema_module.__schema__(:fields) -- (schema_module.__schema__(:embeds) ++ schema_module.__schema__(:associations))
  end

  def embedded_changeset(struct, data) do
    struct |> Ecto.Changeset.cast(data, castable_fields(struct.__struct__))
  end
end
jeromedoyle

jeromedoyle OP

Thanks for the example @tme_317. This may help me figure it out. I’m just not seeing anywhere that dictates user["_embedded"]["addresses"] would be mapped to %User{addresses: ...} instead of %User{_embedded: %{addresses: ...}} . My lack of familiarity with Ecto probably doesn’t help either.

IvanR

IvanR

One alternative valid way is to use Jason and plain structs with @type t :: ... definitions plus Domo for validation.

Considering MapShaper module from this example app, the structs can be defined like:

defmodule Address do
  @moduledoc false

  use Domo

  defstruct [city: "", state: ""]

  @type t :: %__MODULE__{city: String.t(), state: String.t()}
end

defmodule User do
  @moduledoc false

  use Domo

  today = NaiveDateTime.utc_now()
  defstruct [id: 0, fname: "", lname: "", email: "", createdOn: today, updatedOn: today, addresses: [%Address{}]]

  @type t :: %__MODULE__{
    id: non_neg_integer(),
    fname: String.t(),
    lname: String.t(),
    email: String.t(),
    createdOn: NaiveDateTime.t(),
    updatedOn: NaiveDateTime.t(),
    addresses: [Address.t()]
  }

  defimpl MapShaper.Target do
    def translate_source_map(_value, map) do
      addresses = get_in(map, ["_embedded", "addresses"])
      created_on = map |> get_in(["createdOn"]) |> parse_date()
      updated_on = map |> get_in(["updatedOn"]) |> parse_date()

      map
      |> Map.put("addresses", addresses)
      |> Map.put("createdOn", created_on)
      |> Map.put("updatedOn", updated_on)
    end

    defp parse_date(str) do
      str
      |> NaiveDateTime.from_iso8601()
      |> then(fn
        {:ok, date_time} -> date_time
        _ -> nil
      end)
    end
  end
end

And parsing + validation that looks like:

with {:ok, binary} <- File.read("user.json"),
      {:ok, map} <- Jason.decode(binary),
      user = MapShaper.from_map(%User{}, map),
      {:ok, user} <- User.ensure_type_ok(user) do
  user
end

Returns the following nested struct for the valid input:

%User{
  id: 283230,
  fname: "John",
  lname: "Smith",
  email: "john.smith@example.com",
  createdOn: ~N[2016-03-31 10:49:11.386],
  updatedOn: ~N[2016-10-31 16:36:12.968],
  addresses: [
    %Address{city: "Minneapolis", state: "MN"},
    %Address{city: "New Orleans", state: "LA"}
  ]
}
— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews