jeromedoyle

jeromedoyle

Does anyone have an example of using Ecto Schemas for parsing JSON api responses?
I’m curious how you can convert this

{
    "id": 283230,
    "fname": "John",
    "lname": "Smith",
    "email": "john.smith@example.com",
    "createdOn": "2016-03-31T10:49:11.386-05:00",
    "updatedOn": "2016-10-31T16:36:12.968-05:00",
    "_embedded": {
      "addresses": [
        {
          "city": "Minneapolis",
          "state": "MN"
        },
        {
          "city": "New Orleans",
          "state": "LA"
        }
      ]
    }
}

into this

%User{
  id: 283230,
  fname: "John",
  lname: "Smith",
  email: "john.smith@example.com",
  createdOn: "2016-03-31T10:49:11.386-05:00",
  updatedOn: "2016-10-31T16:36:12.968-05:00",
  addresses: [
    %Address{
      "city": "Minneapolis",
      "state": "MN"
    },
    %Address{
      "city": "New Orleans",
      "state": "LA"
    }
  ]
}

Showing Posts 1 to 6

NobbZ

NobbZ

Poison and its protocols are designed for this.

There might be alternatives available, but poison is in phoenix by default.

jeromedoyle

jeromedoyle OP

Thanks @NobbZ. I have written my own implementation of Poison.Decoder in the past, but thought I saw somewhere that this was possible with Ecto and was curious how it was done.

OvermindDL1

OvermindDL1

Via poison’s protocol it is yes. :slight_smile:

tme_317

tme_317

Hi @jeromedoyle,

If you want to use Ecto rather than Poison’s protocols, here is an example.

I’m just casting the API response but you could also add Changeset validations if you want and only returning if valid? == true. Hope this helps!

defmodule MyApp.SmartyUSStreet.Response do
  use Ecto.Schema

  alias MyApp.Addresses.Address

  import Ecto.Changeset

  @primary_key false
  embedded_schema do
    field :input_id
    field :input_index, :integer
    field :candidate_index, :integer
    field :addressee
    field :delivery_line_1
    field :delivery_line_2
    field :last_line
    field :delivery_point_barcode

    embeds_one :components, Components do
      field :street_name
      field :city_name
      field :default_city_name
      field :state_abbreviation
      field :zipcode
      field :plus4_code
      # ...
    end

    embeds_one :metadata, Metadata do
      field :record_type
      field :zip_type
      field :county_fips
      field :county_name
      # ...
    end

    embeds_one :analysis, Analysis do
      field :dpv_match_code
      field :dpv_footnotes
      field :dpv_cmra
      # ...
    end
  end

  def list_from_json(data) when is_binary(data) do
    Poison.decode!(data) |> list_from_json()
  end

  def list_from_json(data) when is_list(data) do
    data
    |> Enum.map(fn x -> list_from_json(x) end)
    |> List.flatten()
  end

  def list_from_json(data) when is_map(data) do
    %__MODULE__{}
    |> cast(data, castable_fields(__MODULE__))
    |> cast_embed(:components, with: &embedded_changeset/2)
    |> cast_embed(:metadata, with: &embedded_changeset/2)
    |> cast_embed(:analysis, with: &embedded_changeset/2)
    |> apply_changes()
    |> List.wrap()
  end

  def castable_fields(schema_module) do
    schema_module.__schema__(:fields) -- (schema_module.__schema__(:embeds) ++ schema_module.__schema__(:associations))
  end

  def embedded_changeset(struct, data) do
    struct |> Ecto.Changeset.cast(data, castable_fields(struct.__struct__))
  end
end
jeromedoyle

jeromedoyle OP

Thanks for the example @tme_317. This may help me figure it out. I’m just not seeing anywhere that dictates user["_embedded"]["addresses"] would be mapped to %User{addresses: ...} instead of %User{_embedded: %{addresses: ...}} . My lack of familiarity with Ecto probably doesn’t help either.

IvanR

IvanR

One alternative valid way is to use Jason and plain structs with @type t :: ... definitions plus Domo for validation.

Considering MapShaper module from this example app, the structs can be defined like:

defmodule Address do
  @moduledoc false

  use Domo

  defstruct [city: "", state: ""]

  @type t :: %__MODULE__{city: String.t(), state: String.t()}
end

defmodule User do
  @moduledoc false

  use Domo

  today = NaiveDateTime.utc_now()
  defstruct [id: 0, fname: "", lname: "", email: "", createdOn: today, updatedOn: today, addresses: [%Address{}]]

  @type t :: %__MODULE__{
    id: non_neg_integer(),
    fname: String.t(),
    lname: String.t(),
    email: String.t(),
    createdOn: NaiveDateTime.t(),
    updatedOn: NaiveDateTime.t(),
    addresses: [Address.t()]
  }

  defimpl MapShaper.Target do
    def translate_source_map(_value, map) do
      addresses = get_in(map, ["_embedded", "addresses"])
      created_on = map |> get_in(["createdOn"]) |> parse_date()
      updated_on = map |> get_in(["updatedOn"]) |> parse_date()

      map
      |> Map.put("addresses", addresses)
      |> Map.put("createdOn", created_on)
      |> Map.put("updatedOn", updated_on)
    end

    defp parse_date(str) do
      str
      |> NaiveDateTime.from_iso8601()
      |> then(fn
        {:ok, date_time} -> date_time
        _ -> nil
      end)
    end
  end
end

And parsing + validation that looks like:

with {:ok, binary} <- File.read("user.json"),
      {:ok, map} <- Jason.decode(binary),
      user = MapShaper.from_map(%User{}, map),
      {:ok, user} <- User.ensure_type_ok(user) do
  user
end

Returns the following nested struct for the valid input:

%User{
  id: 283230,
  fname: "John",
  lname: "Smith",
  email: "john.smith@example.com",
  createdOn: ~N[2016-03-31 10:49:11.386],
  updatedOn: ~N[2016-10-31 16:36:12.968],
  addresses: [
    %Address{city: "Minneapolis", state: "MN"},
    %Address{city: "New Orleans", state: "LA"}
  ]
}
— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews