satom99
Dealing with parameter validation in Phoenix controllers is a rather tedious task, especially when dealing with multiple parameters, types, default values and additional validations one may need. Therefore having a library handle all of this automatically is basically a necessity - which is where paramus comes in handy.
Repository: GitHub - satom99/paramus: Parameter validation for Phoenix · GitHub
Contributions are more than welcome, as always!
Trending in Announcing
The repo is at GitHub - cyberchitta/openai_ex: Community maintained Elixir library for OpenAI API · GitHub.
Docs are at OpenaiEx User Gu...
New
WebAuthnLiveComponent WebAuthnComponents
See this post about renaming the package.
Passwordless authentication for Phoenix LiveView app...
New
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
I released Doggo, a collection of unstyled Phoenix components.
https://github.com/woylie/doggo
Features
Unstyled Phoenix components....
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
I’ll shortly be launching Text, a nascent text analysis library.
Current functionality
In this early version (not ready for prime time) ...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
What IDE or editor are you using for Elixir development?
Personally, I use Zed, and I really like it, but sometimes I wish there were a ...
New
I just stumbled on a newly redesigned elixir-lang.org. :tada: It looks like @Software_Mansion did the work, and I think it is generally a...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #ai
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
anandtrex
@satom99 Looks really nice. Any plans to put it on hex.pm?
mythicalprogrammer
I’m curious on when would I use this when ecto schema have type and validation no?
I’m also coming from php and old school MVC framework where the idea is fat model and skinny controller.
Is there any benefit over ecto schema and changeset validation?
Thanks for the contribution
satom99
Sure thing! It is now available on hex here
.
I presume we’re discussing a case where you’d put the params directly through an ecto schema’s changeset before insterting or updating a specific resource - say per example creating a user.
If that’s the case, you could go without paramus just fine. However, in the event that a changeset validation fails, if you are using the bangified functions (i.e. Repo.insert/1) an error will be raised, then picked up by Phoenix and turned into a response code of 422 - which is fine for most cases. But if you wanted to return a message explaining what was wrong, you’d use the non-bangified functions and typically match in a case statement whether the operation failed and then traverse the changeset’s errors manually and whatnot - and this clearly results in repeated code if needed on multiple places.
So as a tldr I would add that paramus comes in handy (when acting against ecto schemas) “only” if you want to be able to display changeset errors without having to handle the logic yourself.
All of this being said; I myself also use paramus on non-ecto-schema-related handlers. Per example, say I have an endpoint that interacts with a running GenServer and that I want the received data to be in a specific format. Lets consider this example, I could have a server “storing” fruits and very easily call that consume endpoint with a name, quantity and possibly a cut? value and pass all of these directly to the server without having to care about validating the data manually.
Also I haven’t really specified this before but, paramus refers to the project’s ErrorView to handle the changeset errors - have a look here. So if, as mentioned, you wanted to display changeset errors, because the changeset is passed down as a parameter to the error view, you could traverse it there.