rm-rf-etc
I’m creating a custom type and I need to define original logic for the square bracket operator. How do I go about doing this? Do I use defimpl to define a protocol, or write a macro, or use Access behavior? Or some combination thereof?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
LostKobrakai
You should just need to implement the access behaviour: Access — Elixir v1.20.2
rm-rf-etc
@LostKobrakai my struct is a table, so I need the brackets to take two indices. Would I implement this using syntax like
[a][b]or[a, b]? I guess I’m still confused how behavior gets implemented. For example, let’s say I want to define access to also support a range for the index, so I could use an index (for the column) and a range for the row (to produce the enumerable for the subset of rows from the given column).rm-rf-etc
Okay, I see now that
Access.get/3is invoked when I use the square bracket, but in some cases it callsAccess.fetch/2, so I don’t get this. I was able to implementfetch/2so that I can usemy_table[{0, 0}]to get the first entry from the first column, but[0, 0]would be a lot nicer.I see this now, getting educated on how elixir works.
LostKobrakai
If you look at
put_in,update_inorpop_inthose brakets could also invoke different callbacks of the behaviour besidesfetch/2. As you’ve noticed those brackets are a way for you to supply a key to be used. That key can be any term, but as you’ve seen it needs to be one term not many.