rm-rf-etc
I’m creating a custom type and I need to define original logic for the square bracket operator. How do I go about doing this? Do I use defimpl to define a protocol, or write a macro, or use Access behavior? Or some combination thereof?
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #ai
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
LostKobrakai
You should just need to implement the access behaviour: Access — Elixir v1.20.2
rm-rf-etc
@LostKobrakai my struct is a table, so I need the brackets to take two indices. Would I implement this using syntax like
[a][b]or[a, b]? I guess I’m still confused how behavior gets implemented. For example, let’s say I want to define access to also support a range for the index, so I could use an index (for the column) and a range for the row (to produce the enumerable for the subset of rows from the given column).rm-rf-etc
Okay, I see now that
Access.get/3is invoked when I use the square bracket, but in some cases it callsAccess.fetch/2, so I don’t get this. I was able to implementfetch/2so that I can usemy_table[{0, 0}]to get the first entry from the first column, but[0, 0]would be a lot nicer.I see this now, getting educated on how elixir works.
LostKobrakai
If you look at
put_in,update_inorpop_inthose brakets could also invoke different callbacks of the behaviour besidesfetch/2. As you’ve noticed those brackets are a way for you to supply a key to be used. That key can be any term, but as you’ve seen it needs to be one term not many.