wintermeyer
Setup:
mix igniter.install ash_authentication_phoenix
mix ash_authentication.add_strategy password
I create a user in the web application. Now I want to access that user in the iex. How can I do that? This doesn’t work:
iex(5)> ExampleApp.Accounts.User |> Ash.Query.filter(email = "bob@example.com") |> Ash.read!()
** (Ash.Error.Invalid) Invalid Error
* No primary action of type :read for resource ExampleApp.Accounts.User, and no action specified
The resource includes this code:
read :get_by_email do
description "Looks up a user by their email"
get? true
argument :email, :ci_string do
allow_nil? false
end
filter expr(email == ^arg(:email))
end
How can I use that in the iex to fetch a single user by his email address?
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication):
toke...
New
Is there any way to avoid the Hologram compiler running when using iex? It seems like the front-end code could potentially be disregarded...
New
** (ArgumentError) expected :max_attempts to be a positive integer, got: {:@, [line: 10, column: 19], [{:max_attempts, [line: 10, column:...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 9- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
zachdaniel
Relevant docs on primary actions: Actions — ash v3.29.3
I considered making the generators add a primary read action, but users is a pretty sensitive resource and I wanted to add only the minimal required to power authentication.
You will also need to add
authorize?: falseto your call because of the policies on users. A mild inconvenience, but the security benefits are worth itSo after adding a primary action:
Ash.get!(User, <id>, authorize?: false)wintermeyer
So adding
primary? trueto an action should solve my problem. Let’s do that:But it doesn’t work:
What is my mistake?
frankdugan3
It’s not defined on the
Ashmodule. You want something likeAsh.get!(User, ...)like Zach showed in his example.zachdaniel
Primary actions should not define required arguments generally. You would leave the arguments out, and
Ash.getdoes the filtering.zachdaniel
If you want a named function, use code interfaces.
wintermeyer
Until now nobody gave me an actual example that I or anybody else who runs into the same problem can use.
I really don’t care how. I just want to fetch the user with the email address
bob@example.com. How can I do this and what is the most “Ash like” way?zachdaniel
There are examples of using
Ash.getin the read actions guide:The most idiomatic way to do this is as follows:
Add the default read
Add a code interface on the domain
Call it
wintermeyer
Thank you Zach! That solves my problem.
Follow up understanding issue: Why don’t/can’t I use the already existing
read :get_by_email do ... endcode in theuser.exfile for this?zachdaniel
Oh, right
I forgot that we generated that action in the auth generators TBH
I thought it was a custom action you had written.
You can use that existing action. In that case, the only thing you need is this:
Generally speaking, making an action just to get something by a given field is not necessary, because code interfaces have
get_byoption, and you can useAsh.getas well. However, in the case ofAshAuthenticationit needs to be guaranteed to have an action whose name it knows in order to look up users for authentication. You’re free to use that generated action for this as well