bluegene
Recently after spending an hour debugging/staring at a code, I found out that one or more blankspaces are allowed when invoking a function. For example,
iex(7)> IO. puts "hello"
hello
:ok
iex(8)> IO. puts("hello")
hello
:ok
I personally think this will introduce bugs. Here’s one instance where I ran into a problem when I mistakenly typed a period instead of a comma:
def handle_call(request, _caller, state) do
{:reply, request. state}
end
When invoking a GenServer call, I got,
14:19:30.744 [error] GenServer :my_registry terminating
** (UndefinedFunctionError) function :some_request.state/0 is undefined (module :some_request is not available)
:some_request.state()
echo_gen_server.ex:13: EchoGenServer.handle_call/3
(stdlib) gen_server.erl:661: :gen_server.try_handle_call/4
(stdlib) gen_server.erl:690: :gen_server.handle_msg/6
(stdlib) proc_lib.erl:249: :proc_lib.init_p_do_apply/3
What is the reasoning behind allowing blankspaces between Module and function invocation? Shouldn’t the compiler flag this and reported as error?
Where Next?
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
Bringing learning, work and compliance together since 1987.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #blog-post
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #hex
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Error tracking, logs, uptime, and Just Enough APM. Built for developers.
Elixir, Erlang & BEAM conferences from Code Sync - join us in 2026!
Practical resources that improve the lives of professional developers.
Master modern tools, write cleaner code, and tackle real-world challenges.
The deployment platform built for Elixir: PaaS ease, VPS control.
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"
Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
lpil
This is quite normal behaviour for a parser. With most parser technologies it is considerably more difficult to add this kind of whitespace sensitivity (and it would disallow splitting map access chains over multiple lines).
Try adding whitespace in random places in various languages, I think you’ll be surprised where it’s allowed.
hauleth
It just makes parser simpler, as it tokenise it to
{{:., [], [IO, :puts]}, [], ["hello"]}(simplified). As you can see.is independent operator, lust like+or|>. Disallowing spaces around only one operator just for sake of I-have-no-idea-what would be pointless.Nicd
This reminds me of the PHP “downto” operator
:
-->hauleth
It came out from C, I do not know if there is any previous example of
--operator.