TrailingDots
In the source code I find this pattern repeated over and over.
As an example, in the elixir-1.5.3/lib/elixir/lib/enum.ex I find:
@spec reduce(t, acc, reducer) :: result
def reduce(enumerable, acc, fun)
The “def reduce…” has no “do” block. Almost all specs in this
file follow this pattern. Some do not.
Is this a “template” of some sort?
I’ve looked but can’t find an explanation.
What is this pattern called?
What changes when a spec has this and some specs do not?
Is this “def” without a “do” related to a “spec” at all? If not,
then what does this syntax provide?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security










Showing Posts 5 to 1- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
TrailingDots
Most interesting OvermindDL1.
I get warning messages that finally error out.
Interesting to try various compiler suggested mods.
I don’t thoroughly understand it either, but thanks for the tip.
OvermindDL1
You can only have one default clause per function, so if you have many heads then you put it on the bodyless clause.
lalo2302
It also helps the compiler when you have multiple definitions with default values. For example
Try it without the bodyless clause and it should display a warning. (It should, but I’m on mobile so I can’t be sure).
I don’t know exactly why, I just discovered it a few days ago.
TrailingDots
Thanks! Now that I know the name, “bodyless clause”, I
found something about this bugger.
None of my Elixir books or searches of “def without do”
or similar guesses offered any illumination.
Thanks again!

NobbZ
It’s called a body less clause, and in this case used only to name params for the docs, as they are used only as patterns in the following clauses and the names given by the algorithm were not very good.
This kind of vodyless clause is optional.
If though you do use default arguments in functions that have multiple clauses a bodyless clause specifying the default arguments is mandatory.